In Answer Set Programming (ASP), the user can define declaratively a problem and solve it with efficient solvers; practical applications of ASP are countless and several constraint problems have been successfully solved with ASP. On the other hand, solution time usually grows in a superlinear way (often, exponential) with respect to the size of the instance, which is impractical for large instances. A widely used approach is to split the optimization problem into sub-problems that are solved in sequence, some committing to the values assigned by others, and reconstructing a valid assignment for the whole problem by juxtaposing the solutions of the single sub-problems. On the one hand this approach is much faster, due to the superlinear behavior; on the other hand, it does not provide any guarantee of optimality: committing to the assignment of one sub-problem can rule out the optimal solution from the search space. In other research areas, Logic-Based Benders Decomposition (LBBD) proved effective; in LBBD, the problem is decomposed into a Master Problem (MP) and one or several Sub-Problems (SP). The solution of the MP is passed to the SPs, that can possibly fail. In case of failure, a no-good is returned to the MP, that is solved again with the addition of the new constraint. The solution process is iterated until a valid solution is obtained for all the sub-problems or the MP is proven infeasible. The obtained solution is provably optimal under very mild conditions. In this paper, we apply for the first time LBBD to ASP, exploiting an application in health care as case study. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the approach. We believe that the availability of LBBD can further increase the practical applicability of ASP technologies.

Logic-based Benders decomposition (LBBD) is a powerful hybrid optimisation technique that can combine the strong dual bounds of mixed integer programming (MIP) with the combinatorial search strengths of constraint programming (CP). A major drawback of LBBD is that it is a far more involved process to implement an LBBD solution to a problem than the "model-and-run" approach provided by both CP and MIP. We propose an automated approach that accepts an arbitrary MiniZinc model and solves it using LBBD with no additional intervention on the part of the modeller. The design of this approach also reveals an interesting duality between LBBD and large neighborhood search (LNS). We compare our implementation of this approach to CP and MIP solvers on 4 different problem classes where LBBD has been applied before.

We address a scheduling problem in the context of military aircraft maintenance where the goal is to meet the aircraft requirements for a number of missions in the presence of breakdowns. The assignment of aircraft to a mission must consider the requirements for the mission, the probability of aircraft failure, and capacity of the repair shop that maintains the aircraft. Therefore, a solution both assigns aircraft to missions and schedules the repair shop to meet the assignments. We propose a dispatching heuristic algorithm; three complete approaches based on mixed integer programming, constraint programming, and logic-based Benders decomposition; and a hybrid heuristic-complete approach. Experiments demonstrate that the logic-based Benders variation combining mixed integer programming and constraint programming outperforms the other approaches, that the dispatching heuristic can feasibly schedule the repair shop in a very short time, and that using the dispatching solution as a bound marginally improves the complete approaches.