Recent works of Mei et al. (2023, 2024) have deepened the theoretical understanding of the *Stochastic Gradient Bandit* (SGB) policy, showing that using a constant learning rate guarantees asymptotic convergence to the optimal policy, and that sufficiently *small* learning rates can yield logarithmic regret. However, whether logarithmic regret holds beyond small learning rates remains unclear. In this work, we take a step towards characterizing the regret *regimes* of SGB as a function of its learning rate. For two--armed bandits, we identify a sharp threshold, scaling with the sub-optimality gap $\Delta$, below which SGB achieves *logarithmic* regret on all instances, and above which it can incur *polynomial* regret on some instances. This result highlights the necessity of knowing (or estimating) $\Delta$ to ensure logarithmic regret with a constant learning rate. For general $K$-armed bandits, we further show the learning rate must scale inversely with $K$ to avoid polynomial regret. We introduce novel techniques to derive regret upper bounds for SGB, laying the groundwork for future advances in the theory of gradient-based bandit algorithms.

We study the decades-old problem of online portfolio management and propose the first algorithm with logarithmic regret that is not based on Cover's Universal Portfolio algorithm and admits much faster implementation. Specifically Universal Portfolio enjoys optimal regret $\mathcal{O}(N\ln T)$ for $N$ financial instruments over $T$ rounds, but requires log-concave sampling and has a large polynomial running time. Our algorithm, on the other hand, ensures a slightly larger but still logarithmic regret of $\mathcal{O}(N^2(\ln T)^4)$, and is based on the well-studied Online Mirror Descent framework with a novel regularizer that can be implemented via standard optimization methods in time $\mathcal{O}(TN^{2.5})$

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Theyhavebeen studied extensively and have numerous applications, such as clinical trials, ad placements, and dynamic pricing to name a few.

Recently, researchers from convex optimization proposed the notions of "relative Lipschitz continuity" and "relative strong convexity". Both of the notions are generalizations oftheirclassicalcounterparts.