Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating scientific hypothesis generation, yet existing approaches primarily yield coarse-grained hypotheses lacking critical methodological and experimental details. We introduce and formally define the new task of fine-grained scientific hypothesis discovery, which entails generating detailed, experimentally actionable hypotheses from coarse initial research directions. We frame this as a combinatorial optimization problem and investigate the upper limits of LLMs' capacity to solve it when maximally leveraged. Specifically, we explore four foundational questions: (1) how to best harness an LLM's internal heuristics to formulate the fine-grained hypothesis it itself would judge as the most promising among all the possible hypotheses it might generate, based on its own internal scoring-thus defining a latent reward landscape over the hypothesis space; (2) whether such LLM-judged better hypotheses exhibit stronger alignment with ground-truth hypotheses; (3) whether shaping the reward landscape using an ensemble of diverse LLMs of similar capacity yields better outcomes than defining it with repeated instances of the strongest LLM among them; and (4) whether an ensemble of identical LLMs provides a more reliable reward landscape than a single LLM. To address these questions, we propose a hierarchical search method that incrementally proposes and integrates details into the hypothesis, progressing from general concepts to specific experimental configurations. We show that this hierarchical process smooths the reward landscape and enables more effective optimization. Empirical evaluations on a new benchmark of expert-annotated fine-grained hypotheses from recent literature show that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines.1

Prompt engineering is crucial for leveraging the full potential of large language models (LLMs). While automatic prompt optimization offers a scalable alternative to costly manual design, generating effective prompts remains challenging. Existing methods often struggle to stably generate improved prompts, leading to low efficiency, and overlook that prompt optimization easily gets trapped in local optima. Addressing this, we propose GRACE, a framework that integrates two synergistic strategies: Gated Refinement and Adaptive Compression, achieving Efficient prompt optimization. The gated refinement strategy introduces a feedback regulation gate and an update rejection gate, which refine update signals to produce stable and effective prompt improvements.

Langevin Dynamics (LD) and its discrete proposal have been widely applied in the field of Combinatorial Optimization (CO). Both sampling-based and data-driven approaches have benefited significantly from these methods. However, LD's reliance on Gaussian noise limits its ability to escape narrow local optima, requires costly parallel chains, and performs poorly in rugged landscapes or with non-strict constraints. These challenges have impeded the development of more advanced approaches. To address these issues, we introduce Fractional Langevin Dynamics (FLD) for CO, replacing Gaussian noise with $\alpha$-stable L\'evy noise. FLD can escape from local optima more readily via L\'evy flights, and in multiple-peak CO problems with high potential barriers it exhibits a polynomial escape time that outperforms the exponential escape time of LD. Moreover, FLD coincides with LD when $\alpha = 2$, and by tuning $\alpha$ it can be adapted to a wider range of complex scenarios in the CO fields. We provide theoretical proof that our method offers enhanced exploration capabilities and improved convergence. Experimental results on the Maximum Independent Set, Maximum Clique, and Maximum Cut problems demonstrate that incorporating FLD advances both sampling-based and data-driven approaches, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in most of the experiments.

Semidefinite programs (SDPs) can be solved in polynomial time by interior point methods, but scalability can be an issue. To address this shortcoming, over a decade ago, Burer and Monteiro proposed to solve SDPs with few equality constraints via rank-restricted, non-convex surrogates. Remarkably, for some applications, local optimization methods seem to converge to global optima of these non-convex surrogates reliably. Although some theory supports this empirical success, a complete explanation of it remains an open question. In this paper, we consider a class of SDPs which includes applications such as max-cut, community detection in the stochastic block model, robust PCA, phase retrieval and synchronization of rotations.

Evolution strategies (ES) are a family of black-box optimization algorithms able to train deep neural networks roughly as well as Q-learning and policy gradient methods on challenging deep reinforcement learning (RL) problems, but are much faster (e.g.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

In this paper, we propose anew class of low-cardinality algorithm that generalizes the local update tomaximize asemidefinite relaxation derived from max-k-cut.