local interpretable model-agnostic explanation
Explainable AI for Radar Resource Management: Modified LIME in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Lu, Ziyang, Gursoy, M. Cenk, Mohan, Chilukuri K., Varshney, Pramod K.
Deep reinforcement learning has been extensively studied in decision-making processes and has demonstrated superior performance over conventional approaches in various fields, including radar resource management (RRM). However, a notable limitation of neural networks is their ``black box" nature and recent research work has increasingly focused on explainable AI (XAI) techniques to describe the rationale behind neural network decisions. One promising XAI method is local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME). However, the sampling process in LIME ignores the correlations between features. In this paper, we propose a modified LIME approach that integrates deep learning (DL) into the sampling process, which we refer to as DL-LIME. We employ DL-LIME within deep reinforcement learning for radar resource management. Numerical results show that DL-LIME outperforms conventional LIME in terms of both fidelity and task performance, demonstrating superior performance with both metrics. DL-LIME also provides insights on which factors are more important in decision making for radar resource management.
Q-LIME $\pi$: A Quantum-Inspired Extension to LIME
Machine learning models offer powerful predictive capabilities but often lack transparency. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) addresses this by perturbing features and measuring their impact on a model's output. In text-based tasks, LIME typically removes present words (bits set to 1) to identify high-impact tokens. We propose \textbf{Q-LIME $\pi$} (Quantum LIME $\pi$), a quantum-inspired extension of LIME that encodes a binary feature vector in a quantum state, leveraging superposition and interference to explore local neighborhoods more efficiently. Our method focuses on flipping bits from $1 \rightarrow 0$ to emulate LIME's ``removal'' strategy, and can be extended to $0 \rightarrow 1$ where adding features is relevant. Experiments on subsets of the IMDb dataset demonstrate that Q-LIME $\pi$ often achieves near-identical top-feature rankings compared to classical LIME while exhibiting lower runtime in small- to moderate-dimensional feature spaces. This quantum-classical hybrid approach thus provides a new pathway for interpretable AI, suggesting that, with further improvements in quantum hardware and methods, quantum parallelism may facilitate more efficient local explanations for high-dimensional data.
Comparison of decision trees with Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) technique and multi-linear regression for explaining support vector regression model in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) values
In this work the decision trees are used for explanation of support vector regression model. The decision trees act as a global technique as well as a local technique. They are compared against the popular technique of LIME which is a local explanatory technique and with multi linear regression. It is observed that decision trees give a lower RMSE value when fitted to support vector regression as compared to LIME in 87% of the runs over 5 datasets. The comparison of results is statistically significant. Multi linear regression also gives a lower RMSE value when fitted to support vector regression model as compared to LIME in 73% of the runs over 5 datasets but the comparison of results is not statistically significant. Also, when used as a local explanatory technique, decision trees give better performance than LIME and the comparison of results is statistically significant.
Model Interpretability and Explainability: A Comprehensive Guide
This article discusses techniques and best practices for explaining the predictions made by tree-based, neural network, and deep learning models. As machine learning models become more prevalent in decision-making processes, it is important to understand how these models make predictions and to be able to explain their decision-making process to a wide range of audiences. This is known as model explainability, or the ability to explain the predictions made by a model in a way that is easily understood by humans. Model explainability is important for a number of reasons, including building trust in the model, identifying biases, and improving the model's performance. There are two main categories of model explainability techniques: local explanation techniques and global explanation techniques.
All Machine Learning Algorithms You Should Know for 2023
Linear/Logistic Regression: a statistical method for modeling the linear relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables -- can be used to understand the relationships between variables based on the t-tests and coefficients. Decision Trees: a type of machine learning algorithm that creates a tree-like model of decisions and their possible consequences. They are useful for understanding the relationships between variables by looking at the rules that split the branches. Principal Component Analysis (PCA): a dimensionality reduction technique that projects the data onto a lower-dimensional space while retaining as much variance as possible. PCA can be used to simplify the data or to determine feature importance.
AI Explainability -- Explained
Machine learning (ML) is powerful. Its models and their interpretability have been the subject of increasing attention over the last few years, as they have grown more powerful and widely used. With the right data, machine learning models can predict new data extremely well with little to no interpretability, but interpretability is important for many reasons. Model interpretability allows us to address some of our most fundamental questions about the predictions that a model makes: What features did you learn? Why did you make this prediction?
A Modified Perturbed Sampling Method for Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanation
Shi, Sheng, Zhang, Xinfeng, Fan, Wei
Explainability is a gateway between Artificial Intelligence and society as the current popular deep learning models are generally weak in explaining the reasoning process and prediction results. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanation (LIME) is a recent technique that explains the predictions of any classifier faithfully by learning an interpretable model locally around the prediction. However, the sampling operation in the standard implementation of LIME is defective. Perturbed samples are generated from a uniform distribution, ignoring the complicated correlation between features. This paper proposes a novel Modified Perturbed Sampling operation for LIME (MPS-LIME), which is formalized as the clique set construction problem. In image classification, MPS-LIME converts the superpixel image into an undirected graph. Various experiments show that the MPS-LIME explanation of the black-box model achieves much better performance in terms of understandability, fidelity, and efficiency.
Interpreting machine learning models with the lime package for R
Many types of machine learning classifiers, not least commonly-used techniques like ensemble models and neural networks, are notoriously difficult to interpret. If the model produces a surprising label for any given case, it's difficult to answer the question, "why that label, and not one of the others?". One approach to this dilemma is the technique known as LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations). The basic idea is that while for highly non-linear models it's impossible to give a simple explanation of the relationship between any one variable and the predicted classes at a global level, it might be possible to asses which variables are most influential on the classification at a local level, near the neighborhood of a particular data point. An procedure for doing so is described in this 2016 paper by Ribeiro et al, and implemented in the R package lime by Thomas Lin Pedersen and Michael Benesty (and a port of the Python package of the same name).
Interpreting machine learning models with the lime package for R
Many types of machine learning classifiers, not least commonly-used techniques like ensemble models and neural networks, are notoriously difficult to interpret. If the model produces a surprising label for any given case, it's difficult to answer the question, "why that label, and not one of the others?". One approach to this dilemma is the technique known as LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations). The basic idea is that while for highly non-linear models it's impossible to give a simple explanation of the relationship between any one variable and the predicted classes at a global level, it might be possible to asses which variables are most influential on the classification at a local level, near the neighborhood of a particular data point. An procedure for doing so is described in this 2016 paper by Ribeiro et al, and implemented in the R package lime by Thomas Lin Pedersen and Michael Benesty (and a port of the Python package of the same name).
Human Interpretable Machine Learning (Part 1) -- The Need and Importance of Model Interpretation
Thanks to all the wonderful folks at DataScience.com and especially Pramit Choudhary for helping me discover the amazing world of model interpretation. The field of Machine Learning has gone through some phenomenal changes over the last decade. Starting off as just a pure academic and research-oriented domain, we have seen widespread industry adoption across diverse domains including retail, technology, healthcare, science and many more. Rather than just running lab experiments to publish a research paper, the key objective of data science and machine learning in the 21st century has changed to tackling and solving real-world problems, automating complex tasks and making our life easier and better. More than often, the standard toolbox of machine learning, statistical or deep learning models remain the same.