Machine learning for differential equations paves the way for computationally efficient alternatives to numerical solvers, with potentially broad impacts in science and engineering. Though current algorithms typically require simulated training data tailored to a given setting, one may instead wish to learn useful information from heterogeneous sources, or from real dynamical systems observations that are messy or incomplete. In this work, we learn general-purpose representations of PDEs from heterogeneous data by implementing joint embedding methods for self-supervised learning (SSL), a framework for unsupervised representation learning that has had notable success in computer vision. Our representation outperforms baseline approaches to invariant tasks, such as regressing the coefficients of a PDE, while also improving the time-stepping performance of neural solvers. We hope that our proposed methodology will prove useful in the eventual development of general-purpose foundation models for PDEs.

We introduce a method for efficiently solving initial-boundary value problems (IBVPs) that uses Lie symmetries to enforce the associated partial differential equation (PDE) exactly by construction. By leveraging symmetry transformations, the model inherently incorporates the physical laws and learns solutions from initial and boundary data. As a result, the loss directly measures the model's accuracy, leading to improved convergence. Moreover, for well-posed IBVPs, our method enables rigorous error estimation. The approach yields compact models, facilitating an efficient optimization. We implement LieSolver and demonstrate its application to linear homogeneous PDEs with a range of initial conditions, showing that it is faster and more accurate than physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). Overall, our method improves both computational efficiency and the reliability of predictions for PDE-constrained problems.

This paper presents intersection of Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) and Lie symmetry group to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of solving partial differential equation (PDEs). Various methods have been developed to solve these equations. A Lie group is an efficient method that can lead to exact solutions for the PDEs that possessing Lie Symmetry. Leveraging the concept of infinitesimal generators from Lie symmetry group in a novel manner within PINN leads to significant improvements in solution of PDEs. In this study three distinct cases are discussed, each showing progressive improvements achieved through Lie symmetry modifications and adaptive techniques. State-of-the-art numerical methods are adopted for comparing the progressive PINN models. Numerical experiments demonstrate the key role of Lie symmetry in enhancing PINNs performance, emphasizing the importance of integrating abstract mathematical concepts into deep learning for addressing complex scientific problems adequately.

Machine learning for differential equations paves the way for computationally efficient alternatives to numerical solvers, with potentially broad impacts in science and engineering. Though current algorithms typically require simulated training data tailored to a given setting, one may instead wish to learn useful information from heterogeneous sources, or from real dynamical systems observations that are messy or incomplete. In this work, we learn general-purpose representations of PDEs from heterogeneous data by implementing joint embedding methods for self-supervised learning (SSL), a framework for unsupervised representation learning that has had notable success in computer vision. Our representation outperforms baseline approaches to invariant tasks, such as regressing the coefficients of a PDE, while also improving the time-stepping performance of neural solvers. We hope that our proposed methodology will prove useful in the eventual development of general-purpose foundation models for PDEs.

Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs) is a class of deep neural network models that interpret the hidden state dynamics of neural networks as an ordinary differential equation, thereby capable of capturing system dynamics in a continuous time framework. In this work, I integrate symmetry regularization into Neural ODEs. In particular, I use continuous Lie symmetry of ODEs and PDEs associated with the model to derive conservation laws and add them to the loss function, making it physics-informed. This incorporation of inherent structural properties into the loss function could significantly improve robustness and stability of the model during training. To illustrate this method, I employ a toy model that utilizes a cosine rate of change in the hidden state, showcasing the process of identifying Lie symmetries, deriving conservation laws, and constructing a new loss function.

As a typical application of deep learning, physics-informed neural network (PINN) {has been} successfully used to find numerical solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs), but how to improve the limited accuracy is still a great challenge for PINN. In this work, we introduce a new method, symmetry-enhanced physics informed neural network (SPINN) where the invariant surface conditions induced by the Lie symmetries or non-classical symmetries of PDEs are embedded into the loss function in PINN, to improve the accuracy of PINN for solving the forward and inverse problems of PDEs. We test the effectiveness of SPINN for the forward problem via two groups of ten independent numerical experiments using different numbers of collocation points and neurons for the heat equation, Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation and potential Burgers {equations} respectively, and for the inverse problem by considering different layers and neurons as well as different training points for the Burgers equation in potential form. The numerical results show that SPINN performs better than PINN with fewer training points and simpler architecture of neural network. Furthermore, we discuss the computational overhead of SPINN in terms of the relative computational cost to PINN and show that the training time of SPINN has no obvious increases, even less than PINN for certain cases.