Open Google and type in the job you want, like "tech lawyer jobs" in the search field. It will search across virtually all the major online job boards and list them under a blue "Jobs" bar. Google lists those jobs that are physically closest to you, and organizes the results in categories, such as "associate," "counsel," "corporate counsel," etc. You can also filter by city, date posted, company type, etc. It features a "job alerts" tool, so that you can tell the program to send you a notice when a job meeting your criteria comes up.

IT HAS wormed its way into almost every sphere of life, and the law is no exception. Artificial intelligence can now handle a lot of the drudgery of legal work: sifting mountains of documents for relevant titbits, for example, or automatically drafting and checking boilerplate contracts. There's even a "superintelligent attorney" app, ROSS, powered by IBM's Watson supercomputer, that fields legal queries by speed-reading legislation and other resources. But what does it mean for the law when an algorithm, rather than a person, calls the shots? Frank Levy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Dana Remus at the University of North Carolina School of Law have been on the case, exploring the potential ramifications of robotic legal assistants.