legal document review
Opening the TAR Black Box: Developing an Interpretable System for eDiscovery Using the Fuzzy ARTMAP Neural Network
Courchaine, Charles, Sethi, Ricky J.
RCV1-v2 and Jeb Bush emails corpora are frequently used in e-Technology-assisted review (TAR) utilizes an information retrieval discovery evaluations [20, 22] because legal matters are often confidential system to discover all, or nearly all, the relevant documents in a [7, 9] and their corpora are unavailable. The 20Newsgroups corpus and help reduce the human effort required to find these documents corpus is commonly used as a test corpus with ART-based algorithms [7, 9, 20]. TAR systems are employed in high-recall tasks [18, 19]; it and the Reuters-21578 corpus are also commonly such as e-discovery, systematic literature reviews, evidence-based used in evaluating text classification algorithms [1].
The Hurdles of Legal Document Review for Law Firms
For attorneys, "discovery" is the critical, information gathering phase of a case. A time that's spent collecting and reviewing evidence that will eventually become the building blocks for future arguments. In times of yore, this process was primarily physical--it involved gathering actual documents, pouring over paper and ink photos, interviewing real live witnesses, and combing through objects archived in evidence storage lockers. These days, however, building a case isn't so much about reviewing what you can see, taste, feel, and smell, as it is about what you can't. It's about combing through huge amounts of unstructured material that only exist as 0s and 1s inside a database somewhere.