learning theory
An Optimal Sauer Lemma Over $k$-ary Alphabets
Hanneke, Steve, Meng, Qinglin, Moran, Shay, Shaeiri, Amirreza
The Sauer-Shelah-Perles Lemma is a cornerstone of combinatorics and learning theory, bounding the size of a binary hypothesis class in terms of its Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. For classes of functions over a $k$-ary alphabet, namely the multiclass setting, the Natarajan dimension has long served as an analogue of VC dimension, yet the corresponding Sauer-type bounds are suboptimal for alphabet sizes $k>2$. In this work, we establish a sharp Sauer inequality for multiclass and list prediction. Our bound is expressed in terms of the Daniely--Shalev-Shwartz (DS) dimension, and more generally with its extension, the list-DS dimension -- the combinatorial parameters that characterize multiclass and list PAC learnability. Our bound is tight for every alphabet size $k$, list size $\ell$, and dimension value, replacing the exponential dependence on $\ell$ in the Natarajan-based bound by the optimal polynomial dependence, and improving the dependence on $k$ as well. Our proof uses the polynomial method. In contrast to the classical VC case, where several direct combinatorial proofs are known, we are not aware of any purely combinatorial proof in the DS setting. This motivates several directions for future research, which are discussed in the paper. As consequences, we obtain improved sample complexity upper bounds for list PAC learning and for uniform convergence of list predictors, sharpening the recent results of Charikar et al.~(STOC~2023), Hanneke et al.~(COLT~2024), and Brukhim et al.~(NeurIPS~2024).
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.24)
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (6 more...)
- Instructional Material (0.46)
- Research Report (0.40)
Parameter-Free Dynamic Regret for Unconstrained Linear Bandits
Rumi, Alberto, Jacobsen, Andrew, Cesa-Bianchi, Nicolò, Vitale, Fabio
We study dynamic regret minimization in unconstrained adversarial linear bandit problems. In this setting, a learner must minimize the cumulative loss relative to an arbitrary sequence of comparators $\boldsymbol{u}_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol{u}_T$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, but receives only point-evaluation feedback on each round. We provide a simple approach to combining the guarantees of several bandit algorithms, allowing us to optimally adapt to the number of switches $S_T = \sum_t\mathbb{I}\{\boldsymbol{u}_t \neq \boldsymbol{u}_{t-1}\}$ of an arbitrary comparator sequence. In particular, we provide the first algorithm for linear bandits achieving the optimal regret guarantee of order $\mathcal{O}\big(\sqrt{d(1+S_T) T}\big)$ up to poly-logarithmic terms without prior knowledge of $S_T$, thus resolving a long-standing open problem.
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Europe > Spain > Catalonia > Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Africa > Middle East > Morocco > Tanger-Tetouan-Al Hoceima Region > Tangier (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining > Big Data (0.55)
- North America > United States > California (0.14)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Germany (0.04)
- Europe > France > Occitanie > Hérault > Montpellier (0.04)
- Europe > France > Île-de-France > Paris > Paris (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining > Big Data (0.48)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > France > Hauts-de-France > Nord > Lille (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > Australian Capital Territory > Canberra (0.04)
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.71)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.68)
- Information Technology > Enterprise Applications > Human Resources > Learning Management (0.52)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Inductive Learning (0.46)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- North America > United States > Arizona (0.05)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Belgium > Flanders > Flemish Brabant > Leuven (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining > Big Data (0.50)