For Generative Adversarial Networks which map a latent distribution to the target distribution, in this paper, we study how the sampling in latent space can affect the generation performance, especially for images. We observe that, as the neural generator is a continuous function, two close samples in latent space would be mapped into two nearby images, while their quality can differ much as the quality generally does not exhibit a continuous nature in pixel space. From such a continuous mapping function perspective, it is also possible that two distant latent samples can be mapped into two close images (if not exactly the same). In particular, if the latent samples are mapped in aggregation into a single mode, mode collapse occurs. Accordingly, we propose adding an implicit latent transform before the mapping function to improve latent $z$ from its initial distribution, e.g., Gaussian. This is achieved using well-developed adversarial sample mining techniques, e.g.

GAN. Experimental results on visual data show that our method can effectively

Combinatorial Optimization (CO) consists of finding the best solution from a discrete set of possibilities by optimizing a given objective function subject to constraints. It has widespread applications across various domains, including vehicle routing (Veres and Moussa, 2019), production planning (Dolgui et al., 2019), and drug discovery (Liu et al., 2017). However, its NP-hard nature and the complexity of many problem variants make solving CO problems highly challenging. Traditional heuristic methods (e.g., (Kirkpatrick et al., 1983; Glover, 1989; Mladenovi c and Hansen, 1997)) rely on hand-crafted rules to guide the search, providing near-optimal solutions with significantly lower computational costs. Inspired by the success of deep learning in computer vision (Krizhevsky et al., 2012; He et al., 2016) and natural language processing (Vaswani et al., 2017; Devlin, 2018), recent years have seen a surge in learning-based Neural Combinatorial Optimization (NCO) approaches for solving CO problems, including the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP). 1

For Generative Adversarial Networks which map a latent distribution to the target distribution, in this paper, we study how the sampling in latent space can affect the generation performance, especially for images. We observe that, as the neural generator is a continuous function, two close samples in latent space would be mapped into two nearby images, while their quality can differ much as the quality generally does not exhibit a continuous nature in pixel space. From such a continuous mapping function perspective, it is also possible that two distant latent samples can be mapped into two close images (if not exactly the same). In particular, if the latent samples are mapped in aggregation into a single mode, mode collapse occurs. Accordingly, we propose adding an implicit latent transform before the mapping function to improve latent z from its initial distribution, e.g., Gaussian.

The above image is from one of the Siraj Raval's YouTube video on GAN. The video is good but when I saw the above image for the first time, I was a bit confused about what GAN really is. However, similar images are often used to explain GANs as they show the overall structure of such networks. In this article, I explain what GAN actually does using a simple project that generates hand-written digit images similar to the ones from the MNIST database. After reading this article, you should be able to understand the above picture very clearly.

We focus on generative autoencoders, such as variational or adversarial autoencoders, which jointly learn a generative model alongside an inference model. Generative autoencoders are those which are trained to softly enforce a prior on the latent distribution learned by the inference model. We call the distribution to which the inference model maps observed samples, the learned latent distribution, which may not be consistent with the prior. We formulate a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling process, equivalent to iteratively decoding and encoding, which allows us to sample from the learned latent distribution. Since, the generative model learns to map from the learned latent distribution, rather than the prior, we may use MCMC to improve the quality of samples drawn from the generative model, especially when the learned latent distribution is far from the prior. Using MCMC sampling, we are able to reveal previously unseen differences between generative autoencoders trained either with or without a denoising criterion.

Two developments of nonlinear latent variable models based on radial basis functions are discussed: in the first, the use of priors or constraints on allowable models is considered as a means of preserving data structure in low-dimensional representations for visualisation purposes. Also, a resampling approach is introduced which makes more effective use of the latent samples in evaluating the likelihood.

Two developments of nonlinear latent variable models based on radial basis functions are discussed: in the first, the use of priors or constraints on allowable models is considered as a means of preserving data structure in low-dimensional representations for visualisation purposes. Also, a resampling approach is introduced which makes more effective use of the latent samples in evaluating the likelihood.

Two developments of nonlinear latent variable models based on radial basis functions are discussed: in the first, the use of priors or constraints on allowable models is considered as a means of preserving data structure in low-dimensional representations for visualisation purposes. Also, a resampling approach is introduced which makes more effective use of the latent samples in evaluating the likelihood.