latent gaussian activity propagation
- North America > United States > Oregon > Washington County > Hillsboro (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Claremont (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
Latent Gaussian Activity Propagation: Using Smoothness and Structure to Separate and Localize Sounds in Large Noisy Environments
We present an approach for simultaneously separating and localizing multiple sound sources using recorded microphone data. Inspired by topic models, our approach is based on a probabilistic model of inter-microphone phase differences, and poses separation and localization as a Bayesian inference problem. We assume sound activity is locally smooth across time, frequency, and location, and use the known position of the microphones to obtain a consistent separation. We compare the performance of our method against existing algorithms on simulated anechoic voice data and find that it obtains high performance across a variety of input conditions.
- North America > United States > Oregon > Washington County > Hillsboro (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Claremont (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
Latent Gaussian Activity Propagation: Using Smoothness and Structure to Separate and Localize Sounds in Large Noisy Environments
We present an approach for simultaneously separating and localizing multiple sound sources using recorded microphone data. Inspired by topic models, our approach is based on a probabilistic model of inter-microphone phase differences, and poses separation and localization as a Bayesian inference problem. We assume sound activity is locally smooth across time, frequency, and location, and use the known position of the microphones to obtain a consistent separation. We compare the performance of our method against existing algorithms on simulated anechoic voice data and find that it obtains high performance across a variety of input conditions.
Reviews: Latent Gaussian Activity Propagation: Using Smoothness and Structure to Separate and Localize Sounds in Large Noisy Environments
This paper describes a system for localization and separation of sound sources recorded by distributed microphone arrays. It is similar to MESSL (Mandel et al, 2009) in its building blocks, but builds upon it by employing a Gaussian process prior to encourage smoothness in time, frequency, and location. It also is targeted to the same application as DALAS (Dorfan et al, 2015) of microphones being distributed in pairs around a large space, but adds the smoothness over time and frequency via the Gaussian process prior. It is evaluated on synthetic sound mixtures that are anechoic, but contain a reasonable amount of additive uncorrelated noise. Its performance is quantified using a new metric that compares the masks it estimates at each microphone to the ideal ratio mask at each microphone.
Latent Gaussian Activity Propagation: Using Smoothness and Structure to Separate and Localize Sounds in Large Noisy Environments
Johnson, Daniel, Gorelik, Daniel, Mawhorter, Ross E., Suver, Kyle, Gu, Weiqing, Xing, Steven, Gabriel, Cody, Sankhagowit, Peter
We present an approach for simultaneously separating and localizing multiple sound sources using recorded microphone data. Inspired by topic models, our approach is based on a probabilistic model of inter-microphone phase differences, and poses separation and localization as a Bayesian inference problem. We assume sound activity is locally smooth across time, frequency, and location, and use the known position of the microphones to obtain a consistent separation. We compare the performance of our method against existing algorithms on simulated anechoic voice data and find that it obtains high performance across a variety of input conditions. Papers published at the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference.
Latent Gaussian Activity Propagation: Using Smoothness and Structure to Separate and Localize Sounds in Large Noisy Environments
Johnson, Daniel, Gorelik, Daniel, Mawhorter, Ross E., Suver, Kyle, Gu, Weiqing, Xing, Steven, Gabriel, Cody, Sankhagowit, Peter
We present an approach for simultaneously separating and localizing multiple sound sources using recorded microphone data. Inspired by topic models, our approach is based on a probabilistic model of inter-microphone phase differences, and poses separation and localization as a Bayesian inference problem. We assume sound activity is locally smooth across time, frequency, and location, and use the known position of the microphones to obtain a consistent separation. We compare the performance of our method against existing algorithms on simulated anechoic voice data and find that it obtains high performance across a variety of input conditions.
- North America > United States > Oregon > Washington County > Hillsboro (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Claremont (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
Latent Gaussian Activity Propagation: Using Smoothness and Structure to Separate and Localize Sounds in Large Noisy Environments
Johnson, Daniel, Gorelik, Daniel, Mawhorter, Ross E., Suver, Kyle, Gu, Weiqing, Xing, Steven, Gabriel, Cody, Sankhagowit, Peter
We present an approach for simultaneously separating and localizing multiple sound sources using recorded microphone data. Inspired by topic models, our approach is based on a probabilistic model of inter-microphone phase differences, and poses separation and localization as a Bayesian inference problem. We assume sound activity is locally smooth across time, frequency, and location, and use the known position of the microphones to obtain a consistent separation. We compare the performance of our method against existing algorithms on simulated anechoic voice data and find that it obtains high performance across a variety of input conditions.
- North America > United States > Oregon > Washington County > Hillsboro (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Claremont (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)