Who goes to a demonstration with a high-powered assault weapon? He planned on bringing his high-powered assault weapon to that demonstration with every intention of using it. He claims it was self-defense -- it was not. He was out for blood, his goal was to shoot and kill as many as possible and claim it was self-defense. Absolutely relieved that the jury in this case based their deliberations and ultimate not guilty verdict on the facts and didn't cower to the obvious intended intimidation of BLM, Antifa, the left-leaning liberal loonies, and last but not least, the lying fake media.

'Tucker Carlson Tonight' host makes the case for why Kyle Rittenhouse is not receiving a fair trial The judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial has just sent the jurors home for the night to think about the trial for yet another day. So far, deliberations, in this case, have lasted about 20 hours. In a normal proceeding, we'd have the jury's decision in about 20 minutes. The essential question, in this case, is really clear did Kyle Rittenhouse have good reason to believe dangerous men were trying to murder him? And the answer is also clear and unequivocal?

Sean Hannity shows how Kyle Rittenhouse is the latest in a long line of victims of Democrats' premature judgment on'Hannity.' This is a rush transcript of "Hannity" on November 17, 2021. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated. It is now officially in the books and still no verdict. Now, earlier, today an explosive new development from the courthouse and it all surrounds this drone footage showing Kyle Rittenhouse shooting Joseph Rosenbaum in what looks like a clear act of self defense. According to one eyewitness account, Rosenbaum threatened Rittenhouse, telling him, quote, I'm going to bleeping kill you. Oh that would be a threat. Then as you can see, right there, Rosenbaum chased Rittenhouse, threw an object at his head, cornered him against a group of parked cars and then lunged for the Rittenhouse's weapon before Rittenhouse discharged his firearm, killing Rosenbaum. Now, a new reason for a potential mistrial is that the defense team did not get this high quality video until it was shown in court. Instead, during discovery, they were emailed a compressed low-quality version and what the prosecution is calling, quote, a bid to undermine Rittenhouse's self- defense. This is now the second mistrial request, one with prejudice and one without, under consideration by the judge. Now, keep in mind, the judge will not likely make a decision until after a verdict has been rendered. If Rittenhouse is found not guilty, there will be no point in declaring a mistrial. Ultimately, there are now multiple legitimate reasons for a possible mistrial with several instances of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, including criticizing the defendant's right to remain silent, maligning the defendant's right to face his accusers, violating an order banning prior gun comments and now failure to turn over video evidence as the law requires. Our very own Gregg Jarrett who will join us in a moment, he'll have a lot more detail on why a mistrial is a definite possibility in this case.

The jury at Kyle Rittenhouse's murder trial Tuesday watched drone video that showed Rittenhouse wheeling around and shooting Joseph Rosenbaum at close range during a night of turbulent protests on the streets of Kenosha. The video, zoomed in and slowed down by a forensic imaging specialist, was played as the prosecution's case appeared to be winding down after a week of testimony in which some of its own witnesses often bolstered Rittenhouse's claim of self-defense. The footage showed Rosenbaum following Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse suddenly spins around and fires his rifle at him. Rosenbaum falls, and Rittenhouse runs around a car. Dr. Doug Kelley, a forensic pathologist with the Milwaukee County medical examiner's office, said Rosenbaum was shot by someone who was within 4 feet of him.