Goto

Collaborating Authors

 knowledge management


A Practitioner's Guide to Continual Multimodal Pretraining

Neural Information Processing Systems

However, practical model deployment often operates in the gap between these two limit cases, as real-world applications demand adaptation to specific subdomains, tasks or concepts -- spread over the entire, varying life cycle of a model.


Cross-Device Collaborative Test-Time Adaptation

Neural Information Processing Systems

Specifically, we maintain and store a set of device-shared domain knowledge vectors, which accumulates the knowledge learned from all devices during their lifelong adaptation process.




Agent Planning with World Knowledge Model

Neural Information Processing Systems

Imitating humans' mental world knowledge model which provides global prior knowledge before the task and maintains local dynamic knowledge during the task, in this paper, we introduce parametric W orld K nowledge M odel ( WKM) to facilitate agent




Federated Graph Learning for Cross-Domain Recommendation Ziqi Y ang

Neural Information Processing Systems

Cross-domain recommendation (CDR) offers a promising solution to the data sparsity problem by enabling knowledge transfer between source and target domains. However, many recent CDR models overlook crucial issues such as privacy as well as the risk of negative transfer (which negatively impact model performance), especially in multi-domain settings.



Supplementary Material: Knowledge-based in silico models and dataset for the comparative evaluation of mammography AI for a range of breast characteristics, lesion conspicuities and doses

Neural Information Processing Systems

M-SYNTH is organized into a directory structure that indicates the parameters. Code and dataset is released with the Creative Commons 1.0 Universal License We now review the timing required to perform mass insertion and imaging. In Table 2, we review the imaging time required for each breast density. The time varies from 2.84 GPU), we were able to generate the complete dataset in about two weeks.Breast Density Time (min) Fatty 13.463809 Scattered 11.002291 Hetero 3.655613 Dense 2.842028 Table 2: Timing analysis for imaging by breast density. Additional renderings of the breast phantoms generated for the study are shown in Figure 1, demonstrating a high level of detail and anatomical variability within and among models.