We present a novel post-processing tool for semantic segmentation of LiDAR point cloud data, called LidarMetaSeg, which estimates the prediction quality segmentwise. For this purpose we compute dispersion measures based on network probability outputs as well as feature measures based on point cloud input features and aggregate them on segment level. These aggregated measures are used to train a meta classification model to predict whether a predicted segment is a false positive or not and a meta regression model to predict the segmentwise intersection over union. Both models can then be applied to semantic segmentation inferences without knowing the ground truth. In our experiments we use different LiDAR segmentation models and datasets and analyze the power of our method. We show that our results outperform other standard approaches.

We present a method that "meta" classifies whether segments (objects) predicted by a semantic segmentation neural network intersect with the ground truth. To this end, we employ measures of dispersion for predicted pixel-wise class probability distributions, like classification entropy, that yield heat maps of the input scene's size. We aggregate these dispersion measures segment-wise and derive metrics that are well-correlated with the segment-wise $\mathit{IoU}$ of prediction and ground truth. In our tests, we use two publicly available DeepLabv3+ networks (pre-trained on the Cityscapes data set) and analyze the predictive power of different metrics and different sets of metrics. To this end, we compute logistic LASSO regression fits for the task of classifying $\mathit{IoU}=0$ vs. $\mathit{IoU} > 0$ per segment and obtain classification rates of up to $81.91\%$ and AUROC values of up to $87.71\%$ without the incorporation of advanced techniques like Monte-Carlo dropout. We complement these tests with linear regression fits to predict the segment-wise $\mathit{IoU}$ and obtain prediction standard deviations of down to $0.130$ as well as $R^2$ values of up to $81.48\%$. We show that these results clearly outperform single-metric baseline approaches.