Goto

Collaborating Authors

 introduce bias


Wasserstein Iterative Networks for Barycenter Estimation

Neural Information Processing Systems

Wasserstein barycenters have become popular due to their ability to represent the average of probability measures in a geometrically meaningful way. In this paper, we present an algorithm to approximate the Wasserstein-2 barycenters of continuous measures via a generative model. Previous approaches rely on regularization (entropic/quadratic) which introduces bias or on input convex neural networks which are not expressive enough for large-scale tasks. In contrast, our algorithm does not introduce bias and allows using arbitrary neural networks. In addition, based on the celebrity faces dataset, we construct Ave, celeba!



Wasserstein Iterative Networks for Barycenter Estimation

Neural Information Processing Systems

Wasserstein barycenters have become popular due to their ability to represent the average of probability measures in a geometrically meaningful way. In this paper, we present an algorithm to approximate the Wasserstein-2 barycenters of continuous measures via a generative model. Previous approaches rely on regularization (entropic/quadratic) which introduces bias or on input convex neural networks which are not expressive enough for large-scale tasks. In contrast, our algorithm does not introduce bias and allows using arbitrary neural networks. In addition, based on the celebrity faces dataset, we construct Ave, celeba!


Artificial intelligence experts address bias in ChatGPT: 'Very hard to prevent bias from happening'

FOX News

Fox News correspondent Mark Meredith has the latest on ChatGPT on'Special Report.' Generative artificial intelligence like ChatGPT is susceptible to several forms of bias and could cause harm if not properly trained, according to artificial intelligence experts. "They absolutely do have bias," expert Flavio Villanustre told Fox News Digital. "Unfortunately, it is very hard to deal with this from a coding standpoint. It is very hard to prevent bias from happening."


3 Ways to Eliminate Data Biases at Your Company

#artificialintelligence

AI and machine learning are becoming synonymous with business success. Everywhere you look, companies are utilizing data to reach new heights. In spite of its benefits, though, utilizing data analysis in business still comes with its fair share of issues. One of these is data bias. Data bias occurs when an enterprise uses data that isn't representative of the end-user or any other focal point of a study.


How AI bias happens โ€“ and how to eliminate it

#artificialintelligence

Artificial intelligence holds great promise for healthcare, and it is already being put to use by many forward-looking hospitals and health systems. One challenge for healthcare CIOs and clinical users of AI-powered health technologies is the biases that may pop up in algorithms. These biases, such as algorithms that improperly skew results because of race, can compromise the ultimate work of AI โ€“ and clinicians. We spoke recently with Dr. Sanjiv M. Narayan, co-director of the Stanford Arrhythmia Center, director of its Atrial Fibrillation Program and professor of medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine. He offered his perspective on how biases arise in AI โ€“ and what healthcare organizations can do to prevent them.


Study suggests that AI model selection might introduce bias

#artificialintelligence

Register for a free or VIP pass today. The past several years have made it clear that AI and machine learning are not a panacea when it comes to fair outcomes. Applying algorithmic solutions to social problems can magnify biases against marginalized peoples; undersampling populations always results in worse predictive accuracy. But bias in AI doesn't arise from the datasets alone. Problem formulation, or the way researchers fit tasks to AI techniques, can contribute.


Bias and Variance of Post-processing in Differential Privacy

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Post-processing immunity is a fundamental property of differential privacy: it enables the application of arbitrary data-independent transformations to the results of differentially private outputs without affecting their privacy guarantees. When query outputs must satisfy domain constraints, post-processing can be used to project the privacy-preserving outputs onto the feasible region. Moreover, when the feasible region is convex, a widely adopted class of post-processing steps is also guaranteed to improve accuracy. Post-processing has been applied successfully in many applications including census data-release, energy systems, and mobility. However, its effects on the noise distribution is poorly understood: It is often argued that post-processing may introduce bias and increase variance. This paper takes a first step towards understanding the properties of post-processing. It considers the release of census data and examines, both theoretically and empirically, the behavior of a widely adopted class of post-processing functions.


Create an Ethics Committee to Keep Your AI Initiative in Check

#artificialintelligence

WITF-FM, a public radio, television, and online news broadcaster in central Pennsylvania, includes the following statement above select online news coverage: "WITF strives to provide nuanced perspectives from the most authoritative sources. We are on the lookout for biases or assumptions in our own work, and we invite you to point out any we may have missed." It's not uncommon for news organizations to invite comments and feedback from their audience; in fact, most encourage it. But WITF has gone above and beyond a general invitation for engagement. This statement highlights the potential for bias in their own reporting -- and their attempt to avoid it.


Compatible features for Monotonic Policy Improvement

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Recent policy optimization approaches have achieved substantial empirical success by constructing surrogate optimization objectives. The Approximate Policy Iteration objective (Schulman et al., 2015a; Kakade and Langford, 2002) has become a standard optimization target for reinforcement learning problems. Using this objective in practice requires an estimator of the advantage function. Policy optimization methods such as those proposed in Schulman et al. (2015b) estimate the advantages using a parametric critic. In this work we establish conditions under which the parametric approximation of the critic does not introduce bias to the updates of surrogate objective. These results hold for a general class of parametric policies, including deep neural networks. We obtain a result analogous to the compatible features derived for the original Policy Gradient Theorem (Sutton et al., 1999). As a result, we also identify a previously unknown bias that current state-of-the-art policy optimization algorithms (Schulman et al., 2015a, 2017) have introduced by not employing these compatible features.