individualized partial ranking
iSplit LBI: Individualized Partial Ranking with Ties via Split LBI
Qianqian Xu, Xinwei Sun, Zhiyong Yang, Xiaochun Cao, Qingming Huang, Yuan Yao
Due to the inherent uncertainty of data, the problem of predicting partial ranking from pairwise comparison data with ties has attracted increasing interest in recent years. However, in real-world scenarios, different individuals often hold distinct preferences. It might be misleading to merely look at a global partial ranking while ignoring personal diversity. In this paper, instead of learning a global ranking which is agreed with the consensus, we pursue the tie-aware partial ranking from an individualized perspective. Particularly, we formulate a unified framework which not only can be used for individualized partial ranking prediction, but also be helpful for abnormal user selection.
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- (6 more...)
- Information Technology > Communications > Social Media > Crowdsourcing (0.69)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Data Science (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.68)
Response Letter of "iSplit LBI: Individualized Partial Ranking with Ties via Split LBI " 1 ID2161
We thank all the reviewers for your time in reviewing this paper and also for your suggestive comments. We will add detailed remarks if accepted. Y es, they are the same as the metrics used in the multi-label setting. Some typos to be corrected. They follow the same settings with the simulated study.
Reviews: iSplit LBI: Individualized Partial Ranking with Ties via Split LBI
The motivating example in its introduction makes me believe that tie-aware ranking is crucial for crowdsourcing problems. Different from this routine, their proposed method explicitly separates the strong signals and weak signals, then uses strong signals to learn a semantic structure as the outlier indicator and combines both the weak and strong signals to do a fine-grained prediction. As pointed out in the work,its helps to decouple the model selection and model prediction process.
iSplit LBI: Individualized Partial Ranking with Ties via Split LBI
Xu, Qianqian, Sun, Xinwei, Yang, Zhiyong, Cao, Xiaochun, Huang, Qingming, Yao, Yuan
Due to the inherent uncertainty of data, the problem of predicting partial ranking from pairwise comparison data with ties has attracted increasing interest in recent years. However, in real-world scenarios, different individuals often hold distinct preferences. It might be misleading to merely look at a global partial ranking while ignoring personal diversity. In this paper, instead of learning a global ranking which is agreed with the consensus, we pursue the tie-aware partial ranking from an individualized perspective. Particularly, we formulate a unified framework which not only can be used for individualized partial ranking prediction, but also be helpful for abnormal user selection. This is realized by a variable splitting-based algorithm called \ilbi. Specifically, our algorithm generates a sequence of estimations with a regularization path, where both the hyperparameters and model parameters are updated. At each step of the path, the parameters can be decomposed into three orthogonal parts, namely, abnormal signals, personalized signals and random noise. The abnormal signals can serve the purpose of abnormal user selection, while the abnormal signals and personalized signals together are mainly responsible for individual partial ranking prediction. Extensive experiments on simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate that our new approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art alternatives. The code is now availiable at https://github.com/qianqianxu010/NeurIPS2019-iSplitLBI.
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- (6 more...)
- Information Technology > Communications > Social Media > Crowdsourcing (0.69)
- Information Technology > Data Science (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.47)