importance sample
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Bristol (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models (0.68)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.30)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > Puerto Rico > San Juan > San Juan (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.04)
- North America > United States > North Carolina > Orange County > Chapel Hill (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Asia (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Data Science (0.69)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.30)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > Puerto Rico > San Juan > San Juan (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.04)
- North America > United States > North Carolina > Orange County > Chapel Hill (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Asia (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Data Science (0.69)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Bristol (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models (0.68)
We have simplified Figure 3 considerably, removing STL (which uses biased gradients), and removing 2 row C
We would like to thank the reviewers for their kind and thoughtful comments. Any attempt to mitigate particle degeneracy (e.g. Replicating Fig 1BD, we find similar, albeit less extreme results, with TMC always being faster than SMC. In particular, we have included Eq. 36 in the main text, and also included the corresponding choice of This should help to clarify that Eq. 11 applies to any directed graphical model (we have also included references In the example in Figure 1, we consider a model that does not have a chain-structure (see Appendix Figure 1A). IW AE performs arbitrarily badly due to the high-dimensionality of the state-space.
Importance Sampling via Score-based Generative Models
Kim, Heasung, Lee, Taekyun, Kim, Hyeji, de Veciana, Gustavo
Importance sampling, which involves sampling from a probability density function (PDF) proportional to the product of an importance weight function and a base PDF, is a powerful technique with applications in variance reduction, biased or customized sampling, data augmentation, and beyond. Inspired by the growing availability of score-based generative models (SGMs), we propose an entirely training-free Importance sampling framework that relies solely on an SGM for the base PDF. Our key innovation is realizing the importance sampling process as a backward diffusion process, expressed in terms of the score function of the base PDF and the specified importance weight function--both readily available--eliminating the need for any additional training. We conduct a thorough analysis demonstrating the method's scalability and effectiveness across diverse datasets and tasks, including importance sampling for industrial and natural images with neural importance weight functions. The training-free aspect of our method is particularly compelling in real-world scenarios where a single base distribution underlies multiple biased sampling tasks, each requiring a different importance weight function. To the best of our knowledge our approach is the first importance sampling framework to achieve this.
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.14)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado > Denver County > Denver (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria > Catanzaro Province > Catanzaro (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.71)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.69)