Despite the recent success in a plethora of hyperparameter optimization (HPO) methods for machine learning (ML) models, the intricate interplay between model hyperparameters (HPs) and predictive losses (a.k.a fitness), which is a key prerequisite for understanding HPO, remain notably underexplored in our community. This results in limited explainability in the HPO process, rendering a lack of human trust and difficulties in pinpointing algorithm bottlenecks. In this paper, we aim to shed light on this black box by conducting large-scale fitness landscape analysis (FLA) on 1,500 HP loss landscapes of 6 ML models with more than 11 model configurations, across 67 datasets and different levels of fidelities. We reveal the first unified, comprehensive portrait of their topographies in terms of smoothness, neutrality and modality. We also show that such properties are highly transferable across datasets and fidelities, providing fundamental evidence for the success of multi-fidelity and transfer learning methods. These findings are made possible by developing a dedicated FLA framework that incorporates a combination of visual and quantitative measures. We further demonstrate the potential of this framework by analyzing the NAS-Bench-101 landscape, and we believe it is able to faciliate fundamental understanding of a broader range of AutoML tasks.

Although Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown to be capable of producing impressive results, its use is limited by the impact of its hyperparameters on performance. This often makes it difficult to achieve good results in practice. Automated RL (AutoRL) addresses this difficulty, yet little is known about the dynamics of the hyperparameter landscapes that hyperparameter optimization (HPO) methods traverse in search of optimal configurations. In view of existing AutoRL approaches dynamically adjusting hyperparameter configurations, we propose an approach to build and analyze these hyperparameter landscapes not just for one point in time but at multiple points in time throughout training. Addressing an important open question on the legitimacy of such dynamic AutoRL approaches, we provide thorough empirical evidence that the hyperparameter landscapes strongly vary over time across representative algorithms from RL literature (DQN, PPO, and SAC) in different kinds of environments (Cartpole, Bipedal Walker, and Hopper) This supports the theory that hyperparameters should be dynamically adjusted during training and shows the potential for more insights on AutoRL problems that can be gained through landscape analyses. Our code can be found at https://github.com/automl/AutoRL-Landscape