Hyperbolic representations are effective in modeling knowledge graph data which is prevalently used to facilitate multi-hop reasoning. However, a rigorous and detailed comparison of the two spaces for this task is lacking. In this paper, through a simple integration of hyperbolic representations with an encoder-decoder model, we perform a controlled and comprehensive set of experiments to compare the capacity of hyperbolic space versus Euclidean space in multi-hop reasoning. Our results show that the former consistently outperforms the latter across a diverse set of datasets. In addition, through an ablation study, we show that a learnable curvature initialized with the delta hyperbolicity of the utilized data yields superior results to random initializations. Furthermore, our findings suggest that hyperbolic representations can be significantly more advantageous when the datasets exhibit a more hierarchical structure.

Recently, Hyperbolic Spaces in the context of Non-Euclidean Deep Learning have gained popularity because of their ability to represent hierarchical data. We propose that it is possible to take advantage of the hierarchical characteristic present in the images by using hyperbolic neural networks in a GAN architecture. In this study, different configurations using fully connected hyperbolic layers in the GAN, CGAN, and WGAN are tested, in what we call the HGAN, HCGAN, and HWGAN, respectively. The results are measured using the Inception Score (IS) and the Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) on the MNIST dataset. Depending on the configuration and space curvature, better results are achieved for each proposed hyperbolic versions than their euclidean counterpart.