LLMs are computationally expensive to pre-train due to their large scale.

Recently, there has been increasing interest in efficient pretraining paradigms for training Transformer-based models. Several recent approaches use smaller models to initialize larger models in order to save computation (e.g., stacking and fusion). In this work, we study the fundamental question of how to select the best growing strategy from a given pool of growing strategies. Prior works have extensively focused on loss- and/or function-preserving behavior at initialization or simply performance at the end of training. Instead, we identify that behavior at initialization can be misleading as a predictor of final performance and present an alternative perspective based on early training dynamics, which we call "landscape-aware growing (LAG)". We perform extensive analysis of correlation of the final performance with performance in the initial steps of training and find early and more accurate predictions of the optimal growing strategy (i.e., with only a small "lag" after initialization). This perspective also motivates an adaptive strategy for gradual stacking.

LLMs are computationally expensive to pre-train due to their large scale. Model growth emerges as a promising approach by leveraging smaller models to accelerate the training of larger ones. However, the viability of these model growth methods in efficient LLM pre-training remains underexplored. This work identifies three critical $\underline{\textit{O}}$bstacles: ($\textit{O}$1) lack of comprehensive evaluation, ($\textit{O}$2) untested viability for scaling, and ($\textit{O}$3) lack of empirical guidelines. To tackle $\textit{O}$1, we summarize existing approaches into four atomic growth operators and systematically evaluate them in a standardized LLM pre-training setting. Our findings reveal that a depthwise stacking operator, called $G_{\text{stack}}$, exhibits remarkable acceleration in training, leading to decreased loss and improved overall performance on eight standard NLP benchmarks compared to strong baselines. Motivated by these promising results, we conduct extensive experiments to delve deeper into $G_{\text{stack}}$ to address $\textit{O}$2 and $\textit{O}$3. For $\textit{O}$2 (untested scalability), our study shows that $G_{\text{stack}}$ is scalable and consistently performs well, with experiments up to 7B LLMs after growth and pre-training LLMs with 750B tokens. For example, compared to a conventionally trained 7B model using 300B tokens, our $G_{\text{stack}}$ model converges to the same loss with 194B tokens, resulting in a 54.6\% speedup. We further address $\textit{O}$3 (lack of empirical guidelines) by formalizing guidelines to determine growth timing and growth factor for $G_{\text{stack}}$, making it practical in general LLM pre-training. We also provide in-depth discussions and comprehensive ablation studies of $G_{\text{stack}}$. Our code and pre-trained model are available at $\href{https://llm-stacking.github.io/}{https://llm-stacking.github.io/}$.

Acceleration of large language model pre-training is a critical issue in present NLP research. In this paper, we focus on speeding up pre-training by progressively growing from a small Transformer structure to a large one. There are two main research problems related to progressive growth: growth schedule and growth operator. For growth schedule, existing work has explored multi-stage expansion of depth and feedforward layers. However, the impact of each dimension on the schedule's efficiency is still an open question. For growth operator, existing work relies on the initialization of new weights to inherit knowledge, and achieve only non-strict function preservation, limiting further optimization of training dynamics. To address these issues, we propose Masked Structural Growth (MSG), including growth schedules involving all possible dimensions and strictly function-preserving growth operators that is independent of the initialization of new weights. Experiments show that MSG is significantly faster than related work: we achieve a speed-up of 80% for Bert-base and 120% for Bert-large pre-training. Moreover, MSG is able to improve fine-tuning performances at the same time.

Scaling transformers has led to significant breakthroughs in many domains, leading to a paradigm in which larger versions of existing models are trained and released on a periodic basis. New instances of such models are typically trained completely from scratch, despite the fact that they are often just scaled-up versions of their smaller counterparts. How can we use the implicit knowledge in the parameters of smaller, extant models to enable faster training of newer, larger models? This paper describes an approach for accelerating transformer training by learning to grow pretrained transformers, where we learn to linearly map the parameters of the smaller model to initialize the larger model. For tractable learning, we factorize the linear transformation as a composition of (linear) widthand depth-growth operators, and further employ a Kronecker factorization of these growth operators to encode architectural knowledge. Extensive experiments across both language and vision transformers demonstrate that our learned Linear Growth Operator (LiGO) can save up to 50% computational cost of training from scratch, while also consistently outperforming strong baselines that also reuse smaller pretrained models to initialize larger models. The transformer architecture (Vaswani et al., 2017) has emerged as a general purpose architecture for modeling many structured domains (Devlin et al., 2019; Brown et al., 2020; Rives et al., 2021; Dosovitskiy et al., 2021; Touvron et al., 2021a). Perhaps more so than other architectures, the transformer empirically seems to have inductive biases that make it especially amenable to scaling (Rosenfeld et al., 2019; Kaplan et al., 2020), which has led to a paradigm in which larger versions of smaller, existing models are trained and released on a periodic basis (e.g., the GPT lineage of models (Radford et al., 2018; 2019; Brown et al., 2020)). New instances of such models are typically trained completely from scratch, despite the fact that they are often scaled-up versions of their smaller counterparts.