The S-Map is a network with a simple learning algorithm that com(cid:173) bines the self-organization capability of the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) and the probabilistic interpretability of the Generative To(cid:173) pographic Mapping (GTM). The simulations suggest that the S(cid:173) Map algorithm has a stronger tendency to self-organize from ran(cid:173) dom initial configuration than the GTM. The S-Map algorithm can be further simplified to employ pure Hebbian learning, with(cid:173) out changing the qualitative behaviour of the network.

In 1869, the first draft of the periodic table was published by Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleev. In terms of data science, his achievement can be viewed as a successful example of feature embedding based on human cognition: chemical properties of all known elements at that time were compressed onto the two-dimensional grid system for tabular display. In this study, we seek to answer the question of whether machine learning can reproduce or recreate the periodic table by using observed physicochemical properties of the elements. To achieve this goal, we developed a periodic table generator (PTG). The PTG is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm based on the generative topographic mapping (GTM), which can automate the translation of high-dimensional data into a tabular form with varying layouts on-demand. The PTG autonomously produced various arrangements of chemical symbols, which organized a two-dimensional array such as Mendeleev's periodic table or three-dimensional spiral table according to the underlying periodicity in the given data. We further showed what the PTG learned from the element data and how the element features, such as melting point and electronegativity, are compressed to the lower-dimensional latent spaces.

The S-Map is a network with a simple learning algorithm that combines the self-organization capability of the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) and the probabilistic interpretability of the Generative Topographic Mapping (GTM). The simulations suggest that the S Map algorithm has a stronger tendency to self-organize from random initial configuration than the GTM. The S-Map algorithm can be further simplified to employ pure Hebbian learning, without changing the qualitative behaviour of the network. 1 Introduction The self-organizing map (SOM; for a review, see [1]) forms a topographic mapping from the data space onto a (usually two-dimensional) output space. The SOM has been succesfully used in a large number of applications [2]; nevertheless, there are some open theoretical questions, as discussed in [1, 3]. Most of these questions arise because of the following two facts: the SOM is not a generative model, i.e. it does not generate a density in the data space, and it does not have a well-defined objective function that the training process would strictly minimize.

The S-Map is a network with a simple learning algorithm that combines the self-organization capability of the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) and the probabilistic interpretability of the Generative Topographic Mapping (GTM). The simulations suggest that the S Map algorithm has a stronger tendency to self-organize from random initial configuration than the GTM. The S-Map algorithm can be further simplified to employ pure Hebbian learning, without changing the qualitative behaviour of the network. 1 Introduction The self-organizing map (SOM; for a review, see [1]) forms a topographic mapping from the data space onto a (usually two-dimensional) output space. The SOM has been succesfully used in a large number of applications [2]; nevertheless, there are some open theoretical questions, as discussed in [1, 3]. Most of these questions arise because of the following two facts: the SOM is not a generative model, i.e. it does not generate a density in the data space, and it does not have a well-defined objective function that the training process would strictly minimize.

The S-Map is a network with a simple learning algorithm that combines theself-organization capability of the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) and the probabilistic interpretability of the Generative Topographic Mapping(GTM). The simulations suggest that the S Map algorithm has a stronger tendency to self-organize from random initialconfiguration than the GTM. The S-Map algorithm can be further simplified to employ pure Hebbian learning, without changingthe qualitative behaviour of the network. 1 Introduction The self-organizing map (SOM; for a review, see [1]) forms a topographic mapping from the data space onto a (usually two-dimensional) output space. The SOM has been succesfully used in a large number of applications [2]; nevertheless, there are some open theoretical questions, as discussed in [1, 3]. Most of these questions arise because of the following two facts: the SOM is not a generative model, i.e. it does not generate a density in the data space, and it does not have a well-defined objective function that the training process would strictly minimize.