Emergency traffic control presents an increasingly critical challenge, requiring seamless coordination among emergency vehicles, regular vehicles, and traffic lights to ensure efficient passage for all vehicles. Existing models primarily only focus on traffic light control, leaving emergency and regular vehicles prone to delay due to the lack of navigation strategies. To address this issue, we propose the Role-aware Multi-agent Traffic Control (RMTC) framework, which dynamically assigns appropriate roles to traffic components for better cooperation by considering their relations with emergency vehicles and adaptively adjusting their policies. Specifically, RMTC introduces a Heterogeneous Temporal Traffic Graph (HTTG) to model the spatial and temporal relationships among all traffic components (traffic lights, regular and emergency vehicles) at each time step. Furthermore, we develop a Dynamic Role Learning model to infer the evolving roles of traffic lights and regular vehicles based on HTTG. Finally, we present a Role-aware Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning approach that learns traffic policies conditioned on the dynamically roles. Extensive experiments across four public traffic scenarios show that RMTC outperforms existing traffic light control methods by significantly reducing emergency vehicle travel time, while effectively preserving traffic efficiency for regular vehicles.

We study the reinforcement learning (RL) problem in a constrained Markov decision process (CMDP), where an agent explores the environment to maximize the expected cumulative reward while satisfying a single constraint on the expected total utility value in every episode. While this problem is well understood in the tabular setting, theoretical results for function approximation remain scarce. This paper closes the gap by proposing an RL algorithm for linear CMDPs that achieves eO( K) regret with an episode-wise zero-violation guarantee. Furthermore, our method is computationally efficient, scaling polynomially with problem-dependent parameters while remaining independent of the state space size. Our results significantly improve upon recent linear CMDP algorithms, which either violate the constraint or incur exponential computational costs.

The integration of logic programs with embedding models resulted in a class of neurosymbolic frameworks that jointly learn symbolic rules and representations for the symbols in the logic (constant or predicate). The key idea that enabled this integration was the differentiable relaxation of unification, the algorithm for variable instantiation during inference in logic programs. Unlike unification, its relaxed counterpart exploits the similarity between symbols in the embedding space to decide when two symbols are semantically equivalent. We show that this similarity between symbols violates the transitive law of equivalence, leading to undesirable side effects in learning and inference. To alleviate those side effects, we are the first to revamp the well-known possible world semantics of probabilistic logic programs into new semantics called equivalence semantics. In our semantics, a probabilistic logic program induces a probability distribution over all possible equivalence relations between symbols, instead of a probability distribution over all possible subsets of probabilistic facts. We propose a factorization of the equivalence distribution using latent random variables and characterize its expressivity. Additionally, we propose both exact and approximate techniques for reasoning in our semantics. Experiments on well-known benchmarks show that the equivalence semantics leads to neurosymbolic models with up to 42% higher results than state-of-the-art baselines.

We present regret minimization algorithms for the contextual multi-armed bandit (CMAB) problem over K actions in the presence of delayed feedback, a scenario where loss observations arrive with delays chosen by an adversary. As a preliminary result, assuming direct access to a finite policy class Π we establish an optimal expected regret bound of O( p KT log|Π|+ p Dlog|Π|) where D is the sum of delays. For our main contribution, we study the general function approximation setting over a (possibly infinite) contextual loss function class F with access to an online least-square regression oracle O over F. In this setting, we achieve an expected regret bound of O( p KTRT(O) + dmaxDβ) assuming FIFO order, where dmax is the maximal delay, RT(O) is an upper bound on the oracle's regret and β is a stability parameter associated with the oracle. We complement this general result by presenting a novel stability analysis of a Hedge-based version of Vovk's aggregating forecaster as an oracle implementation for least-square regression over a finite function class F and show that its stability parameter β is bounded by log|F|, resulting in an expected regret bound of O( p KT log|F|+ p dmaxDlog|F|) which is a dmax factor away from the lower bound of Ω( p KT log|F|+ p Dlog|F|)that we also present.

In off-policy policy evaluation (OPE) tasks within reinforcement learning, Temporal Difference Learning(TD) and Fitted Q-Iteration (FQI) have traditionally been viewed as differing in the number of updates toward the target value function: TD makes one update, FQI makes an infinite number, and Partial Fitted Q-Iteration (PFQI) performs a finite number. We show that this view is not accurate, and provide a new mathematical perspective under linear value function approximation that unifies these methods as a single iterative method solving the same linear system, but using different matrix splitting schemes and preconditioners. We show that increasing the number of updates under the same target value function, i.e., the target network technique, is a transition from using a constant preconditioner to using a data-feature adaptive preconditioner. This elucidates, for the first time, why TD convergence does not necessarily imply FQI convergence, and establishes tight convergence connections among TD, PFQI, and FQI. Our framework enables sharper theoretical results than previous work and characterization of the convergence conditions for each algorithm, without relying on assumptions about the features (e.g., linear independence). We also provide an encoder-decoder perspective to better understand the convergence conditions of TD, and prove, for the first time, that when a large learning rate doesn't work, trying a smaller one may help. Our framework also leads to the discovery of new crucial conditions on features for convergence, and shows how common assumptions about features influence convergence, e.g., the assumption of linearly independent features can be dropped without compromising the convergence guarantees of stochastic TD in the on-policy setting. This paper is also the first to introduce matrix splitting into the convergence analysis of these algorithms.

We study deployment-efficient reward-free exploration with linear function approximation, where the goal is to explore a linear Markov Decision Process (MDP) without revealing the reward function, while minimizing the number of distinct policies implemented during learning. By "deployment efficient", we mean algorithms that require few policies deployed during exploration - crucial in real-world applications where such deployments are costly or disruptive. We design a novel reinforcement learning algorithm that achieves near-optimal deployment efficiency for linear MDPs in the reward-free setting, using at most H exploration policies during execution (where H is the horizon length), while maintaining sample complexity polynomial in feature dimension and horizon length. Unlike previous approaches with similar deployment efficiency guarantees, our algorithm's sample complexity is independent of the reachability or explorability coefficients of the underlying MDP, which can be arbitrarily small and lead to unbounded sample complexity in certain cases - directly addressing an open problem from prior work. Our technical contributions include a data-dependent method for truncating stateaction pairs in linear MDPs, efficient offline policy evaluation and optimization algorithms for these truncated MDPs, and a careful integration of these components to implement reward-free exploration with linear function approximation without sacrificing deployment efficiency.

Safe Reinforcement Learning (RL) is crucial for achieving high performance while ensuring safety in real-world applications. However, the complex interplay of multiple uncertainty sources in real environments poses significant challenges for interpretable risk assessment and robust decision-making. To address these challenges, we propose Fuz-RL, a fuzzy measure-guided robust framework for safe RL. Specifically, our framework develops a novel fuzzy Bellman operator for estimating robust value functions using Choquet integrals. Theoretically, we prove that solving the Fuz-RL problem (in Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) form) is equivalent to solving distributionally robust safe RL problems (in robust CMDP form), effectively reformulating the min-max optimization problem into a tractable CMDP with Choquet-integrated value functions. Empirical analyses on safe-control-gym and safety-gymnasium scenarios demonstrate that Fuz-RL effectively integrates with existing safe RL baselines in a model-free manner, significantly improving both safety and control performance under various types of uncertainties in observation, action, and dynamics. The code is available in https://github.com/waunx/FuzRL.

Reinforcement learning with multinomial logistic (MNL) function approximation has become an important framework due to its flexibility and broad applicability. While existing studies have established regret guarantees under worst-case analysis, they do not capture how performance depends on the variability of the interaction between the learner and the environment. In this paper, we develop a new theoretical analysis for MNL-based Markov decision processes that yields explicit variance-adaptive regret bounds. Our algorithm is computationally efficient and achieves the instance-wise optimal rate of regret, narrowing the gap between upper and lower bounds. Our numerical experiments validate that our method learns optimal policies more efficiently than conventional approaches.

This paper proposes a general machine learning framework called the localization method, which is fundamentally built on two core concepts: localization kernels and local means -- key components that underpin the self-attention mechanism. To establish a rigorous theoretical foundation, the framework is formally defined through two essential pillars: the formulation of the local(-ized) model and the localization trick. We systematically investigate the connections between the localization method and a wide range of existing machine learning models/methods, including (but not limited to) kernel methods, lazy learning, the MeanShift algorithm, relaxation labeling, Hopfield networks, local linear embedding (LLE), fuzzy inference, and denoising autoencoders (DAEs). By dissecting these relationships, we clarify the broader theoretical significance of the localization method and demonstrate its practical applicability across diverse machine learning tasks. Furthermore, we explore advanced extensions of the framework, such as adaptive kernels, hierarchical local models, and non-local models. Notably, we show that the Transformer -- a cornerstone of modern sequence modeling -- can be constructed using hierarchical local models, revealing the ability of the localization method to unify and generalize state-of-the-art architectures. This work not only provides a unified theoretical lens to reinterpret existing models but also offers new methodological tools for designing flexible, data-adaptive learning systems.

Deep neural networks achieve high accuracy on image classification tasks. Yet, they often produce overconfident predictions as which fail to express epistemic uncertainty, and frequently violate logical or structural constraints present in the data. These limitations are particularly pronounced in hierarchical classification, where predictions across fine and coarse levels must remain coherent. We propose, for the first time, a unified neurosymbolic and epistemic modelling framework that augments Swin Transformers with focal set reasoning and differentiable fuzzy logic. Rather than treating labels as isolated categories, our method induces data-driven focal sets within the learnt embedding space, which helps capture epistemic uncertainty over multiple plausible fine-grained classes. These focal sets form the basis of a belief-theoretic layer that uses fuzzy membership functions and t-norm conjunctions to encourage consistency between fine- and coarse-grained predictions. A learnable loss further balances calibration, mass regularisation, and logical consistency, allowing the model to adaptively trade off symbolic structure with data-driven evidence. In experiments on hierarchical image classification, our framework maintains accuracy on par with transformer baselines while providing more calibrated and interpretable predictions, reducing overconfidence and enforcing high logical consistency across hierarchical outputs. Our experimental results show that combining focal set reasoning with fuzzy logic provides a practical step toward deep learning models that are both accurate and epistemically aware.