Towards a deep understanding of these languages in model theory, we establish model-theoretic characterizations for a number of existential rule languages such as (disjunctive) embedded dependencies, tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), (frontier-)guarded TGDs and linear TGDs. All these characterizations hold for arbitrary structures, and most of them also work on the class of finite structures. As a natural application of these characterizations, complexity bounds for the rewritability of above languages are also identified. 1 Introduction Existential rule languages, a family of languages that extend Datalog by allowing existential quantifiers in the rule head, had been initially introduced in databases in 1970s to specify the semantics of data stored in a database [ Abiteboul et al., 1995] . Since then, existential rule languages such as tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), embedded dependencies and equality-generating dependencies have been extensively studied. These language have been recently rediscovered as languages for data exchange [ Fagin et al., 2005 ], data integration [ Lenzerini, 2002 ] and ontology-mediated query answering [ Cal ı et al., 2010 ] .

This paper focuses on the expressive power of disjunctive and normal logic programs under the stable model semantics over finite, infinite, or arbitrary structures. A translation from disjunctive logic programs into normal logic programs is proposed and then proved to be sound over infinite structures. The equivalence of expressive power of two kinds of logic programs over arbitrary structures is shown to coincide with that over finite structures, and coincide with whether or not NP is closed under complement. Over finite structures, the intranslatability from disjunctive logic programs to normal logic programs is also proved if arities of auxiliary predicates and functions are bounded in a certain way.

This paper focuses on computing first-order theories under either stable model semantics or circumscription. A reduction from first-order theories to logic programs under stable model semantics over finite structures is proposed, and an embedding of circumscription into stable model semantics is also given. Having such reduction and embedding, reasoning problems represented by first-order theories under these two semantics can then be handled by using existing answer set solvers. The effectiveness of this approach in computing hard problems beyond NP is demonstrated by some experiments.

An answer set program with variables is first-order definable on finite structures if the set of its finite answer sets can be captured by a first-order sentence, otherwise this program is first-order indefinable on finite structures. In this paper, we study the problem of first-order indefinability of answer set programs. We provide an Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game-theoretic characterization for the first-order indefinability of answer set programs on finite structures. As an application of this approach, we show that the well-known finding Hamiltonian cycles program is not first-order definable on finite structures. We then define two notions named the 0-1 property and unbounded cycles or paths under the answer set semantics, from which we develop two sufficient conditions that may be effectively used in proving a program's first-order indefinability on finite structures under certain circumstances.

In this paper, we propose a translation from normal first-order logic programs under the answer set semantics to first-order theories on finite structures. Specifically, we introduce ordered completions which are modifications of Clark's completions with some extra predicates added to keep track of the derivation order, and show that on finite structures, classical models of the ordered-completion of a normal logic program correspond exactly to the answer sets (stable models) of the logic program.

In this paper, we propose a progression semantics for first-order answer set programs. Based on this new semantics, we are able to define the notion of boundedness for answer set programming. We prove that boundedness coincides with the notions of recursion-free and loop-free under program equivalence, and is also equivalent to first-order definability of answer set programs on arbitrary structures.