Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning (ML) paradigm with collaboration among multiple clients without sharing data. FL is challenging under data heterogeneity and partial client participation. Learning sparse models is useful for communication and computational efficiency in FL, but it is especially difficult in the small-sample high-dimensional regime (d >> N) where optimization can yield parameter configurations that fail to generalize to unseen test data. While magnitude-based pruning doesn't account for uncertainty exploration in the parameter space, a formulation with probabilistic gates and an L0 constraint allows sampling from competing sparse configurations during training. In this work, we study entropy regularization of gate distributions as a mechanism to maintain uncertainty in sparse federated optimization by preventing early commitment to sparse support. We examine its impact under data heterogeneity, client participation heterogeneity, and sparsity. Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks show consistent improvements over federated iterative hard thresholding (Fed-IHT) and pruning after dense federated averaging (FedAvg) training, both in statistical performance on test data and in sparsity recovery accuracy.

Survival analysis is central to clinical decision-making, yet reliable time-to-event models require large, diverse cohorts that are rarely available at a single institution, while privacy regulations restrict the centralization of patient data. Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving alternative by training shared models without exchanging raw data, but its effectiveness for survival modeling under realistic, heterogeneous conditions remains insufficiently understood. This paper presents a systematic, multi-model evaluation of federated survival analysis on a cross-institutional breast cancer cohort with naturally heterogeneous distributed clients. Three representative survival models, the Cox Proportional Hazards model, DeepSurv, and Random Survival Forest (RSF), are compared across centralized, local, and federated training, and three federated optimization strategies (FedAvg, FedProx, and FedAdam) are assessed for the gradient-based models. Results show that FL consistently outperforms local training and approaches, and occasionally exceeds, centralized performance, while RSF offers the best overall balance of discrimination, calibration, and robustness across heterogeneous clients. We further find that performance depends on the diversity of client distributions, and that FedAvg and FedProx are stronger and more stable than FedAdam. Based on these findings, we derive practical, decision-oriented guidelines mapping data, privacy, interpretability, and resource constraints to recommended model and training-paradigm choices for federated survival modeling in healthcare.

Learning efficient visual representations across heterogeneous unlabeled datasets remains a central challenge in federated learning. Effective federated representations require features that are jointly informative across clients while disentangling clientspecific factors without supervision. We thus introduce FORLA, a novel framework for federated object-centric representation learning and feature adaptation using unsupervised slot attention. At the core of our method is a shared feature adapter, trained collaboratively across clients to adapt features from foundation models, and a shared slot attention module that learns to reconstruct the adapted features.

This work tackles the fundamental challenges in Federated Learning (FL) posed by arbitrary client participation and data heterogeneity, prevalent characteristics in practical FL settings. It is well-established that popular FedAvg-style algorithms struggle with exact convergence and can suffer from slow convergence rates since a decaying learning rate is required to mitigate these scenarios. To address these issues, we introduce the concept of stochastic matrix and the corresponding timevarying graphs as a novel modeling tool to accurately capture the dynamics of arbitrary client participation and the local update procedure. Leveraging this approach, we offer a fresh decentralized perspective on designing FL algorithms and present FOCUS, Federated Optimization with Exact Convergence via Push-pull Strategy, a provably convergent algorithm designed to effectively overcome the previously mentioned two challenges. More specifically, we provide a rigorous proof demonstrating that FOCUS achieves exact convergence with a linear rate regardless of the arbitrary client participation, establishing it as the first work to demonstrate this significant result.

Adaptive optimization is critical in federated learning, where enabling adaptivity on both the server and client sides has proven essential for achieving optimal performance. However, the scalability of such jointly adaptive systems is often hindered by resource limitations in communication and memory. In this paper, we introduce a class of efficient adaptive algorithms, named FedAda2 and its enhanced version FedAda2++, designed specifically for large-scale, cross-device federated environments.

The increasing emphasis on privacy and data security has driven the adoption of federated learning (FL). Prompt learning (PL), which fine-tunes prompt embeddings of pretrained models, has gained a surge of interest in FL community, marked by the emergence of an influx of federated prompt learning (FPL) algorithms. Despite recent advancements, a systematic understanding of their underlying mechanisms and principled guidelines for deploying these techniques in different FL scenarios remain absent. Moreover, inconsistent experimental protocols, limited evaluation scenarios, and the lack of the proper assessment of centralized PL methods in existing works have obscured the essence of these algorithms. To close these gaps, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark, named FLIP, to achieve standardized FPL evaluation. FLIP assesses the performance of 13 centralized and FPL methods across 3 FL protocols and 12 open datasets, considering 6 distinct evaluation scenarios. Our findings demonstrate that PL maintains strong generalization performance in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings with minimal resource consumption, but there is no silver bullet found for diverse FPL scenarios. The results (1) pinpoint the suitable application scenarios of each FPL algorithm, (2) demonstrate the competitiveness of adapted centralized PL methods, and (3) offer notable insights to interpret their effectiveness and remaining challenges. All benchmarks and code are available to facilitate further research in this domain2.

Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a shared model without exposing their raw data. However, existing FL research has primarily focused on optimizing learning performance based on the assumption of uniform client participation, with few studies delving into performance fairness under inconsistent client participation, particularly in model-heterogeneous FL environments. In view of this challenge, we propose PHP-FL, a novel model-heterogeneous FL method that explicitly addresses scenarios with varying client participation probabilities to enhance both model accuracy and performance fairness. Specifically, we introduce a Dual-End Aligned ensemble Learning (DEAL) module, where small auxiliary models on clients are used for dual-end knowledge alignment and local ensemble learning, effectively tackling model heterogeneity without a public dataset. Furthermore, to mitigate update conflicts caused by inconsistent participation probabilities, we propose an Importance-driven Selective Parameter Update (ISPU) module, which accurately updates critical local parameters based on training progress. Finally, we implement PHP-FL on a lightweight FL platform with heterogeneous clients across three different client participation patterns. Extensive experiments under heterogeneous settings and diverse client participation patterns demonstrate that PHP-FL achieves state-of-the-art performance in both accuracy and fairness.

Federated Class Incremental Learning (FCIL) aims to collaboratively process continuously increasing incoming tasks across multiple clients. Among various approaches, data replay has become a promising solution, which can alleviate forgetting by reintroducing representative samples from previous tasks. However, their performance is typically limited by class imbalance, both within the replay buffer due to limited global awareness and between replayed and newly arrived classes. To address this issue, we propose a class-wise balancing data replay method for FCIL (FedCBDR), which employs a global coordination mechanism for class-level memory construction and reweights the learning objective to alleviate the aforementioned imbalances. Specifically, FedCBDRhas two key components: 1) the global-perspective data replay module reconstructs global representations of prior task in a privacy-preserving manner, which then guides a class-aware and importance-sensitive sampling strategy to achieve balanced replay; 2) Subsequently, to handle class imbalance across tasks, the task-aware temperature scaling module adaptively adjusts the temperature of logits at both class and instance levels based on task dynamics, which reduces the model's overconfidence in majority classes while enhancing its sensitivity to minority classes. Experimental results verified that FedCBDR achieves balanced class-wise sampling under heterogeneous data distributions and improves generalization under task imbalance between earlier and recent tasks, yielding a 2%-15% Top-1 accuracy improvement over six stateof-the-art methods.

Federated Learning (FL) has recently emerged as the primary approach to overcoming data silos, enabling collaborative model training without sharing sensitive or proprietary data. Parallel Federated Learning (PFL) aggregates models trained independently on each client's local data, which could prevent the model from converging to the optimal solution due to limited data exposure. In contrast, Sequential Federated Learning (SFL) allows models to traverse client datasets sequentially, enhancing data utilization. However, SFL effectiveness is limited in real-world Non-IID scenarios characterized by category shift (inconsistent class distributions) and domain shift (distribution discrepancies). These shifts cause two critical issues: update order sensitivity, where model performance varies significantly with the sequence of client updates; and catastrophic forgetting, where the model forgets previously learned features when trained on new client data. Therefore, based on SFL, we propose a novel updating framework, SPFL (Sequential updates with Parallel aggregation Federated Learning), that can be integrated into existing PFL methods.

Multimodal federated learning (MMFL) has gained increasing popularity due to its ability to leverage the correlation between various modalities, meanwhile preserving data privacy for different clients. However, recent studies show that correlation between modalities increase the vulnerability of federated learning against Gradient Inversion Attack (GIA). The complicated situation of MMFL privacy preserving can be summarized as follows: 1) different modality transmits different amounts of information, thus requires various protection strength; 2) correlation between modalities should be taken into account. This paper introduces an information theory perspective to analyze the leaked privacy in process of MMFL, and tries to propose a more reasonable protection method Sec-MMFL based on assessing different information leakage possibilities of each modality by conditional mutual information and adjust the corresponding protection strength. Moreover, we use mutual information to reduce the cross-modality information leakage in MMFL. Experiments have proven that our method can bring more balanced and comprehensive protection at an acceptable cost.