feature distribution
Co-regularized Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
Deep neural networks, trained with large amount of labeled data, can fail to generalize well when tested with examples from a target domain whose distribution differs from the training data distribution, referred as the source domain. It can be expensive or even infeasible to obtain required amount of labeled data in all possible domains. Unsupervised domain adaptation sets out to address this problem, aiming to learn a good predictive model for the target domain using labeled examples from the source domain but only unlabeled examples from the target domain. Domain alignment approaches this problem by matching the source and target feature distributions, and has been used as a key component in many state-of-the-art domain adaptation methods. However, matching the marginal feature distributions does not guarantee that the corresponding class conditional distributions will be aligned across the two domains. We propose co-regularized domain alignment for unsupervised domain adaptation, which constructs multiple diverse feature spaces and aligns source and target distributions in each of them individually, while encouraging that alignments agree with each other with regard to the class predictions on the unlabeled target examples. The proposed method is generic and can be used to improve any domain adaptation method which uses domain alignment. We instantiate it in the context of a recent state-of-the-art method and observe that it provides significant performance improvements on several domain adaptation benchmarks.
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Barbara County > Santa Barbara (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Barbara County > Santa Barbara (0.04)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > South Australia > Adelaide (0.05)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Surrey (0.05)
- Asia > Vietnam (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Oceania > Australia > South Australia > Adelaide (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Surrey (0.04)
- Asia > Vietnam (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.46)
- North America > United States > Florida > Alachua County > Gainesville (0.14)
- North America > United States > Florida > Orange County > Orlando (0.14)
- North America > United States > Tennessee > Rutherford County > Murfreesboro (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel (0.04)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (0.67)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Asia > China (0.05)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)