We present a method for identifying groups of test examples---slices---on which a model under-performs, a task now known as slice discovery. We formalize coherence---a requirement that erroneous predictions, within a slice, should be wrong for the same reason---as a key property that any slice discovery method should satisfy. We then use influence functions to derive a new slice discovery method, InfEmbed, which satisfies coherence by returning slices whose examples are influenced similarly by the training data. InfEmbed is simple, and consists of applying K-Means clustering to a novel representation we deem influence embeddings. We show InfEmbed outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on 2 benchmarks, and is effective for model debugging across several case studies.

We present a method for identifying groups of test examples---slices---on which a model under-performs, a task now known as slice discovery. We formalize coherence---a requirement that erroneous predictions, within a slice, should be wrong for the same reason---as a key property that any slice discovery method should satisfy. We then use influence functions to derive a new slice discovery method, InfEmbed, which satisfies coherence by returning slices whose examples are influenced similarly by the training data. InfEmbed is simple, and consists of applying K-Means clustering to a novel representation we deem influence embeddings. We show InfEmbed outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on 2 benchmarks, and is effective for model debugging across several case studies.

Given a deep neural network image classification model that we treat as a black box, and an unlabeled evaluation dataset, we develop an efficient strategy by which the classifier can be evaluated. Randomly sampling and labeling instances from an unlabeled evaluation dataset allows traditional performance measures like accuracy, precision, and recall to be estimated. However, random sampling may miss rare errors for which the model is highly confident in its prediction, but wrong. These high-confidence errors can represent costly mistakes, and therefore should be explicitly searched for. Past works have developed search techniques to find classification errors above a specified confidence threshold, but ignore the fact that errors should be expected at confidence levels anywhere below 100\%. In this work, we investigate the problem of finding errors at rates greater than expected given model confidence. Additionally, we propose a query-efficient and novel search technique that is guided by adversarial perturbations to find these mistakes in black box models. Through rigorous empirical experimentation, we demonstrate that our Adversarial Distance search discovers high-confidence errors at a rate greater than expected given model confidence.