In this paper we give the first efficient algorithms for the $k$-center problem on dynamic graphs undergoing edge updates. In this problem, the goal is to partition the input into $k$ sets by choosing $k$ centers such that the maximum distance from any data point to its closest center is minimized. It is known that it is NP-hard to get a better than $2$ approximation for this problem. While in many applications the input may naturally be modeled as a graph, all prior works on $k$-center problem in dynamic settings are on point sets in arbitrary metric spaces. In this paper, we give a deterministic decremental $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm and a randomized incremental $(4+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm, both with amortized update time $kn^{o(1)}$ for weighted graphs. Moreover, we show a reduction that leads to a fully dynamic $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the $k$-center problem, with worst-case update time that is within a factor $k$ of the state-of-the-art fully dynamic $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation single-source shortest paths algorithm in graphs. Matching this bound is a natural goalpost because the approximate distances of each vertex to its center can be used to maintain a $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation of the graph diameter and the fastest known algorithms for such a diameter approximation also rely on maintaining approximate single-source distances.

Despite the success of graph neural networks (GNNs) in various domains, they exhibit susceptibility to adversarial attacks. Understanding these vulnerabilities is crucial for developing robust and secure applications. In this paper, we investigate the impact of test time adversarial attacks through edge perturbations which involve both edge insertions and deletions. A novel explainability-based method is proposed to identify important nodes in the graph and perform edge perturbation between these nodes. The proposed method is tested for node classification with three different architectures and datasets. The results suggest that introducing edges between nodes of different classes has higher impact as compared to removing edges among nodes within the same class.

Core decomposition is an efficient building block for various graph analysis tasks such as dense subgraph discovery and identifying influential nodes. One crucial weakness of the core decomposition is its sensitivity to changes in the graph: inserting or removing a few edges can drastically change the core structure of a graph. Hence, it is essential to characterize, quantify, and, if possible, improve the resilience of the core structure of a given graph in global and local levels. Previous works mostly considered the core resilience of the entire graph or important subgraphs in it. In this work, we study node-based core resilience measures upon edge removals and insertions. We first show that a previously proposed measure, Core Strength, does not correctly capture the core resilience of a node upon edge removals. Next, we introduce the concept of dependency graph to capture the impact of neighbor nodes (for edge removal) and probable future neighbor nodes (for edge insertion) on the core number of a given node. Accordingly, we define Removal Strength and Insertion Strength measures to capture the resilience of an individual node upon removing and inserting an edge, respectively. As naive computation of those measures is costly, we provide efficient heuristics built on key observations about the core structure. We consider two key applications, finding critical edges and identifying influential spreaders, to demonstrate the usefulness of our new measures on various real-world networks and against several baselines. We also show that our heuristic algorithms are more efficient than the naive approaches.

We study the problem of adversarially robust self-supervised learning on graphs. In the contrastive learning framework, we introduce a new method that increases the adversarial robustness of the learned representations through i) adversarial transformations and ii) transformations that not only remove but also insert edges. We evaluate the learned representations in a preliminary set of experiments, obtaining promising results. We believe this work takes an important step towards incorporating robustness as a viable auxiliary task in graph contrastive learning.

A well-known problem in data science and machine learning is {\em linear regression}, which is recently extended to dynamic graphs. Existing exact algorithms for updating the solution of dynamic graph regression problem require at least a linear time (in terms of $n$: the size of the graph). However, this time complexity might be intractable in practice. In the current paper, we utilize {\em subsampled randomized Hadamard transform} and \textsf{CountSketch} to propose the first randomized algorithms. Suppose that we are given an $n\times m$ matrix embedding $M$ of the graph, where $m \ll n$. Let $r$ be the number of samples required for a guaranteed approximation error, which is a sublinear function of $n$. Our first algorithm reduces time complexity of pre-processing to $O(n(m + 1) + 2n(m + 1) \log_2(r + 1) + rm^2)$. Then after an edge insertion or an edge deletion, it updates the approximate solution in $O(rm)$ time. Our second algorithm reduces time complexity of pre-processing to $O \left( nnz(M) + m^3 \epsilon^{-2} \log^7(m/\epsilon) \right)$, where $nnz(M)$ is the number of nonzero elements of $M$. Then after an edge insertion or an edge deletion or a node insertion or a node deletion, it updates the approximate solution in $O(qm)$ time, with $q=O\left(\frac{m^2}{\epsilon^2} \log^6(m/\epsilon) \right)$. Finally, we show that under some assumptions, if $\ln n < \epsilon^{-1}$ our first algorithm outperforms our second algorithm and if $\ln n \geq \epsilon^{-1}$ our second algorithm outperforms our first algorithm.