Evaluating anomaly detection in multivariate time series (MTS) requires careful consideration of temporal dependencies, particularly when detecting subsequence anomalies common in fault detection scenarios. While time series cross-validation (TSCV) techniques aim to preserve temporal ordering during model evaluation, their impact on classifier performance remains underexplored. This study systematically investigates the effect of TSCV strategy on the precision-recall characteristics of classifiers trained to detect fault-like anomalies in MTS datasets. We compare walk-forward (WF) and sliding window (SW) methods across a range of validation partition configurations and classifier types, including shallow learners and deep learning (DL) classifiers. Results show that SW consistently yields higher median AUC-PR scores and reduced fold-to-fold performance variance, particularly for deep architectures sensitive to localized temporal continuity. Furthermore, we find that classifier generalization is sensitive to the number and structure of temporal partitions, with overlapping windows preserving fault signatures more effectively at lower fold counts. A classifier-level stratified analysis reveals that certain algorithms, such as random forests (RF), maintain stable performance across validation schemes, whereas others exhibit marked sensitivity. This study demonstrates that TSCV design in benchmarking anomaly detection models on streaming time series and provide guidance for selecting evaluation strategies in temporally structured learning environments.

Summary and Contributions: Additional comments: - The terms "significant improvements (L282)", "significantly reduce (L298)", and "significant performance improvement (L303)" should be used very carefully because such terms can mislead readers because they may think the results are STATISTICALLY significant. The second example seems to be unrelated with my concern. In summary, I have a concern about the term author used in the paper. Please consider using a different term. A concern has not been addressed but other concerns have been addressed.

Automatic Modulation Classification (AMC), as a crucial technique in modern non-cooperative communication networks, plays a key role in various civil and military applications. However, existing AMC methods usually are complicated and can work in batch mode only due to their high computational complexity. This paper introduces a new online AMC scheme based on Isolation Distributional Kernel. Our method stands out in two aspects. Firstly, it is the first proposal to represent baseband signals using a distributional kernel. Secondly, it introduces a pioneering AMC technique that works well in online settings under realistic time-varying channel conditions. Through extensive experiments in online settings, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed classifier. Our results indicate that the proposed approach outperforms existing baseline models, including two state-of-the-art deep learning classifiers. Moreover, it distinguishes itself as the first online classifier for AMC with linear time complexity, which marks a significant efficiency boost for real-time applications.

Previous research evaluating deep learning (DL) classifiers has often used top-1/top-5 accuracy. However, the accuracy of DL classifiers is unstable in that it often changes significantly when retested on imperfect or adversarial images. This paper adds to the small but fundamental body of work on benchmarking the robustness of DL classifiers on imperfect images by proposing a two-dimensional metric, consisting of mean accuracy and coefficient of variation, to measure the robustness of DL classifiers. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient are used and their independence evaluated. A statistical plot we call mCV is presented which aims to help visualize the robustness of the performance of DL classifiers across varying amounts of imperfection in tested images. Finally, we demonstrate that defective images corrupted by two-factor corruption could be used to improve the robustness of DL classifiers. All source codes and related image sets are shared on a website (http://www.animpala.com) to support future research projects.

To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm to identify poor-quality lateral airway radiographs. A total of 1200 lateral airway radiographs obtained in emergency department patients between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2019, were retrospectively queried from the picture archiving and communication system. Two radiologists classified each radiograph as adequate or inadequate. Disagreements were adjudicated by a third radiologist. The radiographs were used to train and test the DL classifiers.

Adversarial examples in machine learning for images are widely publicized and explored. Illustrations of misclassifications caused by slightly perturbed inputs are abundant and commonly known (e.g., a picture of panda imperceptibly perturbed to fool the classifier into incorrectly labeling it as a gibbon). Similar attacks on deep learning (DL) for radio frequency (RF) signals and their mitigation strategies are scarcely addressed in the published work. Yet, RF adversarial examples (AdExs) with minimal waveform perturbations can cause drastic, targeted misclassification results, particularly against spectrum sensing/survey applications (e.g. BPSK is mistaken for 8-PSK). Our research on deep learning AdExs and proposed defense mechanisms are RF-centric, and incorporate physical world, over-the-air (OTA) effects. We herein present defense mechanisms based on pre-training the target classifier using an autoencoder. Our results validate this approach as a viable mitigation method to subvert adversarial attacks against deep learning-based communications and radar sensing systems.