Inverse design, which seeks to find optimal parameters for a target output, is a central challenge in engineering. Surrogate-based optimization (SBO) has become a standard approach, yet it is fundamentally structured to converge to a single-point solution, thereby limiting design space exploration and ignoring potentially valuable alternative topologies. This paper presents a paradigm shift from single-point optimization to generative inverse design. We introduce a framework based on a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) that learns a probabilistic mapping between a system's design parameters and its performance, enabling the generation of a diverse portfolio of high-performing candidates conditioned on a specific performance objective. We apply this methodology to the complex, non-linear problem of minimizing airfoil self-noise, using a high-performing SBO method from a prior benchmark study as a rigorous baseline. The CVAE framework successfully generated 256 novel designs with a 94.1\% validity rate. A subsequent surrogate-based evaluation revealed that 77.2\% of these valid designs achieved superior performance compared to the single optimal design found by the SBO baseline. This work demonstrates that the generative approach not only discovers higher-quality solutions but also provides a rich portfolio of diverse candidates, fundamentally enhancing the engineering design process by enabling multi-criteria decision-making.

This work seeks to answer key research questions regarding the viability of reinforcement learning over the S&P 500 index. The on-policy techniques of Value Iteration (VI) and State-action-reward-state-action (SARSA) are implemented along with the off-policy technique of Q-Learning. The models are trained and tested on a dataset comprising multiple years of stock market data from 2000-2023. The analysis presents the results and findings from training and testing the models using two different time periods: one including the COVID-19 pandemic years and one excluding them. The results indicate that including market data from the COVID-19 period in the training dataset leads to superior performance compared to the baseline strategies. During testing, the on-policy approaches (VI and SARSA) outperform Q-learning, highlighting the influence of bias-variance tradeoff and the generalization capabilities of simpler policies. However, it is noted that the performance of Q-learning may vary depending on the stability of future market conditions. Future work is suggested, including experiments with updated Q-learning policies during testing and trading diverse individual stocks. Additionally, the exploration of alternative economic indicators for training the models is proposed.

What comes to your mind if you think of Artificial Intelligence? In the public perception, Artificial Intelligence is a future where machines have outstripped humans. Artificial intelligence is no longer an idea of the future. But what should you know if you want to invest in artificial intelligence? Investment in AI is booming. Forrester predicts that investment in AI will grow by 300% in 2017.