Current text-to-image (T2I) models often fail to account for diverse human experiences, leading to misaligned systems. We advocate for pluralism in AI alignment, where an AI understands and is steerable towards diverse, and often conflicting, human values. Our work provides three core contributions to achieve this in T2I models. First, we introduce a novel dataset for Diverse Intersectional Visual Evaluation (DIVE) - the first multimodal dataset for pluralistic alignment. It enables deep alignment to diverse safety perspectives through a large pool of demographically intersectional human raters who provided extensive feedback across 1000 prompts, with high replication, capturing nuanced safety perceptions. Second, we empirically confirm demographics as a crucial proxy for diverse viewpoints in this domain, revealing significant, context-dependent differences in harm perception that diverge from conventional evaluations. Finally, we discuss implications for building aligned T2I models, including efficient data collection strategies, LLM judgment capabilities, and model steerability towards diverse perspectives. This research offers foundational tools for more equitable and aligned T2I systems. Content Warning: The paper includes sensitive content that may be harmful.

J( θ; Da) is the Hessian matrix of the loss function ℓ, at the optimal parameters vector θ, computed using the group data Da (henceforth simply referred to as group hessian), and λ(Σ) is the maximum eigenvalue of a matrix Σ. Proof. Using a second order Taylor expansion around θ, the excessive loss R(a) for a group a A can be stated as: R(a) = J( θ; Da) J( θ; Da) = " J θ; Da + θ θ Hℓa θ θ +O θ θ 3 The above, follows from the loss ℓ() being at least twice differentiable, by assumption. Consider two groups a and b in Awith |Da| |Db|. Proposition 2. For a given group a A, gradient norms can be upper bounded as: gℓa O X The above proposition is presented in the context of cross entropy loss or mean squared error loss functions. These two cases are reviewed as follows 3With a slight abuse of notation, the results refer to θ as the homonymous vector which is extended with k k zeros.

Dynabench comprises four dynamic tasks with multiple rounds of datasets that will grow over time. Given that here we have to be able to evaluate a wide variety of models, both in the loop and outside of it, we employ a black box post hoc approach, i.e., one that can be applied post-data collection to existing data, on any uploaded model, without requiring anything other than its predictions. One straightforward way to measure fairness then, is to apply clearly delimited, heuristic perturbations to existing evaluation datasets, and measure whether performance drops. Such an approach is similar to recent works that use grammars to heuristically generate pairs of examples varying in gender [58] and/or race [67] in that they utilize predefined lists of words. However, because we also want to ensure minimal consequences on our classification labels, we adopted an approach that is more targeted than grammars and also preserves the original input data distribution: we replace each word in the input data that has a clear signal about race/ethnicity and/or gender identity with a similar word referring to another group, rerun inference, and measure how many labels flipped (i.e., the difference in microaverage accuracy).

This paper investigates ML systems serving a group of users, with multiple models/services, each aimed at specializing to a sub-group of users.

In this work, we mainly focus onthe notions ofgroup fairness.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly essential in processing natural languages, yet their application is frequently compromised by biases and inaccuracies originating in their training data.In this study, we introduce \textbf{Cross-Care}, the first benchmark framework dedicated to assessing biases and real world knowledge in LLMs, specifically focusing on the representation of disease prevalence across diverse demographic groups.We systematically evaluate how demographic biases embedded in pre-training corpora like $ThePile$ influence the outputs of LLMs.We expose and quantify discrepancies by juxtaposing these biases against actual disease prevalences in various U.S. demographic groups.Our results highlight substantial misalignment between LLM representation of disease prevalence and real disease prevalence rates across demographic subgroups, indicating a pronounced risk of bias propagation and a lack of real-world grounding for medical applications of LLMs.Furthermore, we observe that various alignment methods minimally resolve inconsistencies in the models' representation of disease prevalence across different languages.For further exploration and analysis, we make all data and a data visualization tool available at: \url{www.crosscare.net}.