degree-corrected stochastic block model
Spectral clustering under degree heterogeneity: a case for the random walk Laplacian
Modell, Alexander, Rubin-Delanchy, Patrick
This paper shows that graph spectral embedding using the random walk Laplacian produces vector representations which are completely corrected for node degree. Under a generalised random dot product graph, the embedding provides uniformly consistent estimates of degree-corrected latent positions, with asymptotically Gaussian error. In the special case of a degree-corrected stochastic block model, the embedding concentrates about K distinct points, representing communities. These can be recovered perfectly, asymptotically, through a subsequent clustering step, without spherical projection, as commonly required by algorithms based on the adjacency or normalised, symmetric Laplacian matrices. While the estimand does not depend on degree, the asymptotic variance of its estimate does -- higher degree nodes are embedded more accurately than lower degree nodes. Our central limit theorem therefore suggests fitting a weighted Gaussian mixture model as the subsequent clustering step, for which we provide an expectation-maximisation algorithm.
Clustering Degree-Corrected Stochastic Block Model with Outliers
Qian, Xin, Chen, Yudong, Minca, Andreea
For the degree corrected stochastic block model in the presence of arbitrary or even adversarial outliers, we develop a convex-optimization-based clustering algorithm that includes a penalization term depending on the positive deviation of a node from the expected number of edges to other inliers. We prove that under mild conditions, this method achieves exact recovery of the underlying clusters. Our synthetic experiments show that our algorithm performs well on heterogeneous networks, and in particular those with Pareto degree distributions, for which outliers have a broad range of possible degrees that may enhance their adversarial power. We also demonstrate that our method allows for recovery with significantly lower error rates compared to existing algorithms.