We develop BatchBALD, a tractable approximation to the mutual information between a batch of points and model parameters, which we use as an acquisition function to select multiple informative points jointly for the task of deep Bayesian active learning. BatchBALD is a greedy linear-time $1 - \nicefrac{1}{e}$-approximate algorithm amenable to dynamic programming and efficient caching. We compare BatchBALD to the commonly used approach for batch data acquisition and find that the current approach acquires similar and redundant points, sometimes performing worse than randomly acquiring data. We finish by showing that, using BatchBALD to consider dependencies within an acquisition batch, we achieve new state of the art performance on standard benchmarks, providing substantial data efficiency improvements in batch acquisition.

Estimating personalized treatment effects from high-dimensional observational data is essential in situations where experimental designs are infeasible, unethical, or expensive. Existing approaches rely on fitting deep models on outcomes observed for treated and control populations. However, when measuring individual outcomes is costly, as is the case of a tumor biopsy, a sample-efficient strategy for acquiring each result is required. Deep Bayesian active learning provides a framework for efficient data acquisition by selecting points with high uncertainty. However, existing methods bias training data acquisition towards regions of non-overlapping support between the treated and control populations. These are not sample-efficient because the treatment effect is not identifiable in such regions. We introduce causal, Bayesian acquisition functions grounded in information theory that bias data acquisition towards regions with overlapping support to maximize sample efficiency for learning personalized treatment effects. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed acquisition strategies on synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets IHDP and CMNIST and their extensions, which aim to simulate common dataset biases and pathologies.

Leveraging human preferences for steering the behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) has demonstrated notable success in recent years. Nonetheless, data selection and labeling are still a bottleneck for these systems, particularly at large scale. Hence, selecting the most informative points for acquiring human feedback may considerably reduce the cost of preference labeling and unleash the further development of LLMs. Bayesian Active Learning provides a principled framework for addressing this challenge and has demonstrated remarkable success in diverse settings. However, previous attempts to employ it for Preference Modeling did not meet such expectations.

Machine learning systems are widely used in many high-stakes contexts in which experimental designs for assigning treatments are infeasible. When evaluating decisions is costly, such as investigating fraud cases, or evaluating biopsy decisions, a sample-efficient strategy is needed. However, while existing active learning methods assume humans will always label the instances selected by the machine learning model, in many critical applications, humans may decline to label instances selected by the machine learning model due to reasons such as regulation constraint, domain knowledge, or algorithmic aversion, thus not sample efficient. In this paper, we study the Active Learning with Instance Rejection (ALIR) problem, which considers the human discretion behavior for high-stakes decision making problems. We propose new active learning algorithms under deep bayesian active learning for selective labeling (SEL-BALD) to address the ALIR problem. Our algorithms consider how to acquire information for both the machine learning model and the human discretion model.

My score remains the same. The methods proposed in the paper elegantly deals with the problem of redundant acquisition when using BALD in a greedy manner. I have a few questions and hope the authors can address them: (1) Does this problem of redundant acquisition only happen when one uses BALD as the score? Intuitively I would think no, as if one uses any score function greedily, regardless of the contribution of the other samples selected in the same batch, one can still end up with a biased batch that can potentially harm training. If this is the case, then why are var-ratios and mean-std outperforming random?

The paper proposes BatchBALD, a batch acquisition function for sample selection in active learning. A greedy optimization algorithm is presented for efficient sample selection and BatchBALD score maximization. The reviewers and AC agree that this is an interesting work and that the approach is clearly presented and convincing. In addition the author response satisfactorily addresses the points raised in the reviews.

Estimating personalized treatment effects from high-dimensional observational data is essential in situations where experimental designs are infeasible, unethical, or expensive. Existing approaches rely on fitting deep models on outcomes observed for treated and control populations. However, when measuring individual outcomes is costly, as is the case of a tumor biopsy, a sample-efficient strategy for acquiring each result is required. Deep Bayesian active learning provides a framework for efficient data acquisition by selecting points with high uncertainty. However, existing methods bias training data acquisition towards regions of non-overlapping support between the treated and control populations.

We develop BatchBALD, a tractable approximation to the mutual information between a batch of points and model parameters, which we use as an acquisition function to select multiple informative points jointly for the task of deep Bayesian active learning. BatchBALD is a greedy linear-time 1 - icefrac{1}{e} -approximate algorithm amenable to dynamic programming and efficient caching. We compare BatchBALD to the commonly used approach for batch data acquisition and find that the current approach acquires similar and redundant points, sometimes performing worse than randomly acquiring data. We finish by showing that, using BatchBALD to consider dependencies within an acquisition batch, we achieve new state of the art performance on standard benchmarks, providing substantial data efficiency improvements in batch acquisition.

Active learning has demonstrated data efficiency in many fields. Existing active learning algorithms, especially in the context of deep Bayesian active models, rely heavily on the quality of uncertainty estimations of the model. However, such uncertainty estimates could be heavily biased, especially with limited and imbalanced training data. In this paper, we propose BALanCe, a Bayesian deep active learning framework that mitigates the effect of such biases. Concretely, BALanCe employs a novel acquisition function which leverages the structure captured by equivalence hypothesis classes and facilitates differentiation among different equivalence classes. Intuitively, each equivalence class consists of instantiations of deep models with similar predictions, and BALanCe adaptively adjusts the size of the equivalence classes as learning progresses. Besides the fully sequential setting, we further propose Batch-BALanCe -- a generalization of the sequential algorithm to the batched setting -- to efficiently select batches of training examples that are jointly effective for model improvement. We show that Batch-BALanCe achieves state-of-the-art performance on several benchmark datasets for active learning, and that both algorithms can effectively handle realistic challenges that often involve multi-class and imbalanced data.

We develop BatchBALD, a tractable approximation to the mutual information between a batch of points and model parameters, which we use as an acquisition function to select multiple informative points jointly for the task of deep Bayesian active learning. BatchBALD is a greedy linear-time $1 - icefrac{1}{e}$-approximate algorithm amenable to dynamic programming and efficient caching. We compare BatchBALD to the commonly used approach for batch data acquisition and find that the current approach acquires similar and redundant points, sometimes performing worse than randomly acquiring data. We finish by showing that, using BatchBALD to consider dependencies within an acquisition batch, we achieve new state of the art performance on standard benchmarks, providing substantial data efficiency improvements in batch acquisition. Papers published at the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference.