decision-making process
- North America > United States > Illinois (0.04)
- Asia > Vietnam (0.04)
- Asia > India (0.04)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Europe > Switzerland (0.04)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Government (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (0.73)
- Asia > China > Guangdong Province > Shenzhen (0.04)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin (0.04)
- Oceania > New Zealand > North Island > Auckland Region > Auckland (0.04)
- (7 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Asia > South Korea > Seoul > Seoul (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Taiwan (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study > Negative Result (0.45)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia (0.04)
UMB: Understanding Model Behavior for Open-World Object Detection
Open-World Object Detection (OWOD) is a challenging task that requires the detector to identify unlabeled objects and continuously demands the detector to learn new knowledge based on existing ones. Existing methods primarily focus on recalling unknown objects, neglecting to explore the reasons behind them. This paper aims to understand the model's behavior in predicting the unknown category. First, we model the text attribute and the positive sample probability, obtaining their empirical probability, which can be seen as the detector's estimation of the likelihood of the target with certain known attributes being predicted as the foreground. Then, we jointly decide whether the current object should be categorized in the unknown category based on the empirical, the in-distribution, and the out-of-distribution probability. Finally, based on the decision-making process, we can infer the similarity of an unknown object to known classes and identify the attribute with the most significant impact on the decision-making process. This additional information can help us understand the behavior of the model's prediction in the unknown class. The evaluation results on the Real-World Object Detection (RWD) benchmark, which consists of five real-world application datasets, show that we surpassed the previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) with an absolute gain of 5.3 mAP for unknown classes, reaching 20.5 mAP. Our code is available at https://github.com/xxyzll/UMB.
Disentangled behavioural representations
Individual characteristics in human decision-making are often quantified by fitting a parametric cognitive model to subjects' behavior and then studying differences between them in the associated parameter space. However, these models often fit behavior more poorly than recurrent neural networks (RNNs), which are more flexible and make fewer assumptions about the underlying decision-making processes. Unfortunately, the parameter and latent activity spaces of RNNs are generally high-dimensional and uninterpretable, making it hard to use them to study individual differences. Here, we show how to benefit from the flexibility of RNNs while representing individual differences in a low-dimensional and interpretable space. To achieve this, we propose a novel end-to-end learning framework in which an encoder is trained to map the behavior of subjects into a low-dimensional latent space. These low-dimensional representations are used to generate the parameters of individual RNNs corresponding to the decision-making process of each subject. We introduce terms into the loss function that ensure that the latent dimensions are informative and disentangled, i.e., encouraged to have distinct effects on behavior. This allows them to align with separate facets of individual differences. We illustrate the performance of our framework on synthetic data as well as a dataset including the behavior of patients with psychiatric disorders.
Altruistic Maneuver Planning for Cooperative Autonomous Vehicles Using Multi-agent Advantage Actor-Critic
Toghi, Behrad, Valiente, Rodolfo, Sadigh, Dorsa, Pedarsani, Ramtin, Fallah, Yaser P.
With the adoption of autonomous vehicles on our roads, we will witness a mixed-autonomy environment where autonomous and human-driven vehicles must learn to coexist by sharing the same road infrastructure. T o attain socially-desirable behaviors, autonomous vehicles must be instructed to consider the utility of other vehicles around them in their decision-making process. Particularly, we study the maneuver planning problem for autonomous vehicles and investigate how a decentralized reward structure can induce altruism in their behavior and incentivize them to account for the interest of other autonomous and human-driven vehicles. This is a challenging problem due to the ambiguity of a human driver's willingness to cooperate with an autonomous vehicle. Thus, in contrast with the existing works which rely on behavior models of human drivers, we take an end-to-end approach and let the autonomous agents to implicitly learn the decision-making process of human drivers only from experience. W e introduce a multi-agent variant of the synchronous Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C) algorithm and train agents that coordinate with each other and can affect the behavior of human drivers to improve traffic flow and safety.Accepted to 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2021) W orkshop on Autonomous Driving: Perception, Prediction and Planning
- North America > United States > Florida > Orange County > Orlando (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Barbara County > Santa Barbara (0.14)
- Asia > Middle East > Republic of Türkiye > Karaman Province > Karaman (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Automobiles & Trucks (0.49)
- Transportation > Ground > Road (0.48)
- Information Technology > Robotics & Automation (0.34)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots > Autonomous Vehicles (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Issues > Social & Ethical Issues (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.47)