Heart disease is a serious global health issue that claims millions of lives every year. Early detection and precise prediction are critical to the prevention and successful treatment of heart related issues. A lot of research utilizes machine learning (ML) models to forecast cardiac disease and obtain early detection. In order to do predictive analysis on "Heart disease health indicators " dataset. We employed five machine learning methods in this paper: Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Linear Discriminant Analysis, Extra Tree Classifier, and AdaBoost. The model is further examined using various feature selection (FS) techniques. To enhance the baseline model, we have separately applied four FS techniques: Sequential Forward FS, Sequential Backward FS, Correlation Matrix, and Chi2. Lastly, K means SMOTE oversampling is applied to the models to enable additional analysis. The findings show that when it came to predicting heart disease, ensemble approaches in particular, random forests performed better than individual classifiers. The presence of smoking, blood pressure, cholesterol, and physical inactivity were among the major predictors that were found. The accuracy of the Random Forest and Decision Tree model was 99.83%. This paper demonstrates how machine learning models can improve the accuracy of heart disease prediction, especially when using ensemble methodologies. The models provide a more accurate risk assessment than traditional methods since they incorporate a large number of factors and complex algorithms.

Failures of fairness or robustness in machine learning predictive settings can be due to undesired dependencies between covariates, outcomes and auxiliary factors of variation. A common strategy to mitigate these failures is data balancing, which attempts to remove those undesired dependencies. In this work, we define conditions on the training distribution for data balancing to lead to fair or robust models. Our results display that, in many cases, the balanced distribution does not correspond to selectively removing the undesired dependencies in a causal graph of the task, leading to multiple failure modes and even interference with other mitigation techniques such as regularization. Overall, our results highlight the importance of taking the causal graph into account before performing data balancing.