First provide a summary of the paper, and then address the following criteria: Quality, clarity, originality and significance. COMMENTS BASED ON REVIEWER DISCUSSIONS AND AUTHOR REBUTTAL: I agree with the other reviewers that more could be done to constrain the specifics of the cue integration mechanism. However, I believe that if the data set is expanded, allowing the models to be better constrained, then the paper is appropriate and interesting for the NIPS community. I have left my quality score as it was, but I agree with the other reviewers that the paper merits a ``1'' rather than a ``2'' for impact score. ORIGINAL REVIEW: Summary: This paper extends an existing model for the perception of visual speed that uses a Bayesian observer model acting on the activity of independent spatiotemporal frequency channels. Previously, the model accounted for illusions of perceived speed by postulating the Bayes-optimal combination of noisy sensory representations with a prior for slow speeds.

The goal of perception is to infer the hidden states in the hierarchical process by which sensory data are generated. Human behavior is consistent with the optimal statistical solution to this problem in many tasks, including cue combination and orientation detection. Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying this behavior is of particular importance, since probabilistic computations are notoriously challenging. Here we propose a simple mechanism for Bayesian inference which involves averaging over a few feature detection neurons which fire at a rate determined by their similarity to a sensory stimulus. This mechanism is based on a Monte Carlo method known as importance sampling, commonly used in computer science and statistics.

We develop a hierarchical generative model to study cue combi(cid:173) nation. The model maps a global shape parameter to local cue(cid:173) specific parameters, which in tum generate an intensity image. Inferring shape from images is achieved by inverting this model. Inference produces a probability distribution at each level; using distributions rather than a single value of underlying variables at each stage preserves information about the validity of each local cue for the given image. This allows the model, unlike standard combination models, to adaptively weight each cue based on gen(cid:173) eral cue reliability and specific image context.

The goal of perception is to infer the hidden states in the hierarchical process by which sensory data are generated. Human behavior is consistent with the optimal statistical solution to this problem in many tasks, including cue combination and orientation detection. Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying this behavior is of particular importance, since probabilistic computations are notoriously challenging. Here we propose a simple mechanism for Bayesian inference which involves averaging over a few feature detection neurons which fire at a rate determined by their similarity to a sensory stimulus. This mechanism is based on a Monte Carlo method known as importance sampling, commonly used in computer science and statistics.

We first compare these models on a formal level.

Bayesian models of multisensory perception traditionally address the problem of estimating an underlying variable that is assumed to be the cause of the two sensory signals. The brain, however, has to solve a more general problem: it also has to establish which signals come from the same source and should be integrated, and which ones do not and should be segregated. In the last couple of years, a few models have been proposed to solve this problem in a Bayesian fashion. One of these has the strength that it formalizes the causal structure of sensory signals. We first compare these models on a formal level. Furthermore, we conduct a psychophysics experiment to test human performance in an auditory-visual spatial localization task in which integration is not mandatory. We find that the causal Bayesian inference model accounts for the data better than other models.

Bayesian models of multisensory perception traditionally address the problem of estimating an underlying variable that is assumed to be the cause of the two sensory signals. The brain, however, has to solve a more general problem: it also has to establish which signals come from the same source and should be integrated, and which ones do not and should be segregated. In the last couple of years, a few models have been proposed to solve this problem in a Bayesian fashion. One of these has the strength that it formalizes the causal structure of sensory signals. We first compare these models on a formal level. Furthermore, we conduct a psychophysics experiment to test human performance in an auditory-visual spatial localization task in which integration is not mandatory. We find that the causal Bayesian inference model accounts for the data better than other models.

We develop a hierarchical generative model to study cue combination. Themodel maps a global shape parameter to local cuespecific parameters,which in tum generate an intensity image. Inferring shape from images is achieved by inverting this model. Inference produces a probability distribution at each level; using distributions rather than a single value of underlying variables at each stage preserves information about the validity of each local cue for the given image. This allows the model, unlike standard combination models, to adaptively weight each cue based on general cuereliability and specific image context.

We develop a hierarchical generative model to study cue combination. The model maps a global shape parameter to local cuespecific parameters, which in tum generate an intensity image. Inferring shape from images is achieved by inverting this model. Inference produces a probability distribution at each level; using distributions rather than a single value of underlying variables at each stage preserves information about the validity of each local cue for the given image. This allows the model, unlike standard combination models, to adaptively weight each cue based on general cue reliability and specific image context.

We develop a hierarchical generative model to study cue combination. The model maps a global shape parameter to local cuespecific parameters, which in tum generate an intensity image. Inferring shape from images is achieved by inverting this model. Inference produces a probability distribution at each level; using distributions rather than a single value of underlying variables at each stage preserves information about the validity of each local cue for the given image. This allows the model, unlike standard combination models, to adaptively weight each cue based on general cue reliability and specific image context.