Abstract-- Non-prehensile manipulation, such as pushing objects to a desired target position, is an important skill for robots to assist humans in everyday situations. However, the task is challenging due to the large variety of objects with different and sometimes unknown physical properties, such as shape, size, mass, and friction. This can lead to the object overshooting its target position, requiring fast corrective movements of the robot around the object, especially in cases where objects need to be precisely pushed. Humans intuitively interact with objects in everyday situations, object pushing based on a recurrent neural network (RNN) often without explicitly planning or thinking about how and model predictive control (MPC) cannot properly switch objects will behave. Non-prehensile object manipulation is an pushing sides, i.e. the model is not able to perform corrective important skill for robots that are designed to assist humans. Additionally, the authors also train a RL agent This work focuses on object pushing, a sub class of robotic as a model-free baseline.

The existence of significant delays in sensorimotor feedback pathways has led several researchers to suggest that the cerebellum might function as a forward model of the motor plant in order to predict the sensory consequences of motor commands before actual feedback is available; e.g., (Ito, 1984; Keeler, 1990; Miall et ai., 1993). While we agree that there are many potential roles for forward models in motor control systems, as discussed, e.g., in (Wolpert et al., 1995), we present a hypothesis about how the cerebellum could participate in regulating movement in the presence of significant feedback delays without resorting to a forward model. We show how a very simplified version of the adjustable pattern generator (APG) model being developed by Houk and colleagues (Berthier et al., 1993; Houk et al., 1995) can learn to control endpoint positioning of a nonlinear spring-mass system with significant delays in both afferent and efferent pathways. Although much simpler than a multilink dynamic arm, control of this spring-mass system involves some of the challenges critical in the control of a more realistic motor system and serves to illustrate the principles we propose. Preliminary results appear in (Buckingham et al., 1995).

The existence of significant delays in sensorimotor feedback pathways has led several researchers to suggest that the cerebellum might function as a forward model of the motor plant in order to predict the sensory consequences of motor commands before actual feedback is available; e.g., (Ito, 1984; Keeler, 1990; Miall et ai., 1993). While we agree that there are many potential roles for forward models in motor control systems, as discussed, e.g., in (Wolpert et al., 1995), we present a hypothesis about how the cerebellum could participate in regulating movement in the presence of significant feedback delays without resorting to a forward model. We show how a very simplified version of the adjustable pattern generator (APG) model being developed by Houk and colleagues (Berthier et al., 1993; Houk et al., 1995) can learn to control endpoint positioning of a nonlinear spring-mass system with significant delays in both afferent and efferent pathways. Although much simpler than a multilink dynamic arm, control of this spring-mass system involves some of the challenges critical in the control of a more realistic motor system and serves to illustrate the principles we propose. Preliminary results appear in (Buckingham et al., 1995).

The existence of significant delays in sensorimotor feedback pathways has led several researchers to suggest that the cerebellum might function as a forward model of the motor plant in order to predict the sensory consequences of motor commands before actual feedback is available; e.g., (Ito, 1984; Keeler, 1990; Miall et ai., 1993). While we agree that there are many potential roles for forward models in motor control systems, as discussed, e.g., in (Wolpert et al., 1995), we present a hypothesis about how the cerebellum could participate in regulating movement in the presence of significant feedbackdelays without resorting to a forward model. We show how a very simplified version of the adjustable pattern generator (APG) model being developed by Houk and colleagues (Berthier et al., 1993; Houk et al., 1995) can learn to control endpointpositioning of a nonlinear spring-mass system with significant delays in both afferent and efferent pathways. Although much simpler than a multilink dynamic arm, control of this spring-mass system involves some of the challenges critical in the control of a more realistic motor system and serves to illustrate the principles we propose. Preliminary results appear in (Buckingham et al., 1995).

A neurophysiologically-based model is presented that controls a simulated kinematic arm during goal-directed reaches. The network generates a quasi-feedforward motor command that is learned using training signals generated by corrective movements. For each target, the network selects and sets the output of a subset of pattern generators. During the movement, feedback from proprioceptors turns off the pattern generators. The task facing individual pattern generators is to recognize when the arm reaches the target and to turn off. A distributed representation of the motor command that resembles population vectors seen in vivo was produced naturally by these simulations.

A neurophysiologically-based model is presented that controls a simulated kinematic arm during goal-directed reaches. The network generates a quasi-feedforward motor command that is learned using training signals generated by corrective movements. For each target, the network selects and sets the output of a subset of pattern generators. During the movement, feedback from proprioceptors turns off the pattern generators. The task facing individual pattern generators is to recognize when the arm reaches the target and to turn off. A distributed representation of the motor command that resembles population vectors seen in vivo was produced naturally by these simulations.

A neurophysiologically-based model is presented that controls a simulated kinematic arm during goal-directed reaches. The network generates a quasi-feedforward motor command that is learned using training signals generated by corrective movements. For each target, the network selects and sets the output of a subset of pattern generators. During the movement, feedbackfrom proprioceptors turns off the pattern generators. The task facing individual pattern generators is to recognize when the arm reaches the target and to turn off. A distributed representation of the motor commandthat resembles population vectors seen in vivo was produced naturally by these simulations.