computational rhetoric and model
The RhetFig Project: Computational Rhetorics and Models of Persuasion
Marco, Chrysanne Di (University of Waterloo) | Harris, Randy Allen (University of Waterloo)
We argue, reason, cajole, and persuade -- we deploy the overtly purposive use of figures. The traditional literary rhetoric -- because we are social animals endowed with a purpose, generating aesthetic pleasure, is best known (poetry symbolic mode of thought and communication who seek and fiction, myths and prayers, songs and jokes, are highly to shape our social environment, to compete, and to cooperate. But mnemonic formulas, As rhetoricians, philosophers, and semiologists have proverbs, oral traditions, children's literature, marketing regularly noticed, some patterns of argumentation and cajolery - in short, any linguistic configuration serving purposes are more successful than others. These patterns of usage in which mental characteristics like attention, learnability, -- collectively known as rhetorical figures -- include both and recollection are at a premium - follows one syntactic and semantic patterns, but it is the schemes (e.g., or several grooves that rhetorical theorists in the classical alliteration (word-initial consonant repetition), assonance and early-modern periods identified with rhetorical figures. The repetition, incrementation, and the like), the insight that importance of rhetorical figuration in modelling aspects of motivates this project is unmistakeable. We believe incorporating rhetorical figuration rhetoric-based metrics for text summarization) into natural language systems will have profound implications.