Diffusion models operate in a reflexive System 1 mode, constrained by a fixed, content-agnostic sampling schedule. This rigidity arises from the curse of state dimensionality, where the combinatorial explosion of possible states in the high-dimensional noise manifold renders explicit trajectory planning intractable and leads to systematic computational misallocation. To address this, we introduce Chain-of-Trajectories (CoTj), a train-free framework enabling System 2 deliberative planning. Central to CoTj is Diffusion DNA, a low-dimensional signature that quantifies per-stage denoising difficulty and serves as a proxy for the high-dimensional state space, allowing us to reformulate sampling as graph planning on a directed acyclic graph. Through a Predict-Plan-Execute paradigm, CoTj dynamically allocates computational effort to the most challenging generative phases. Experiments across multiple generative models demonstrate that CoTj discovers context-aware trajectories, improving output quality and stability while reducing redundant computation. This work establishes a new foundation for resource-aware, planning-based diffusion modeling. The code is available at https://github.com/UnicomAI/CoTj.

Assume the conditions in Proposition 1 hold.

Consider a general formulation of the distributionally robust learning (DRL) problem of active interest.

We are very grateful to all the reviewers for their thoughtful feedback. All typos and minor points will also be fixed. Prop. 3 implies that any inference problem can be decomposed into a sequence of Another consideration, as highlighted by the example of 4.3, is that reducing the Bayesian computation, as the two methods have different computational cost patterns. This is required for each optimization step as well. Currently, however, we haven't found problems where the basis derived from H In the discussion after Prop. 1, we should have The phrase "lack of precision" in 4.4 refers to the finite number of samples drawn from

Assume the conditions in Proposition 1 hold.

A key trait of stochastic optimizers is that multiple runs of the same optimizer in attempting to solve the same problem can produce different results. As a result, their performance is evaluated over several repeats, or runs, on the problem. However, the accuracy of the estimated performance metrics depends on the number of runs and should be studied using statistical tools. We present a statistical analysis of the common metrics, and develop guidelines for experiment design to measure the optimizer's performance using these metrics to a high level of confidence and accuracy. To this end, we first discuss the confidence interval of the metrics and how they are related to the number of runs of an experiment. We then derive a lower bound on the number of repeats in order to guarantee achieving a given accuracy in the metrics. Using this bound, we propose an algorithm to adaptively adjust the number of repeats needed to ensure the accuracy of the evaluated metric. Our simulation results demonstrate the utility of our analysis and how it allows us to conduct reliable benchmarking as well as hyperparameter tuning and prevent us from drawing premature conclusions regarding the performance of stochastic optimizers.

Most autonomous vehicles rely on accurate and efficient localization, which is achieved by comparing live sensor data to a preexisting map, to navigate their environment. Balancing the accuracy of localization with computational efficiency remains a significant challenge, as high-accuracy methods often come with higher computational costs. In this paper, we present two ways of improving lidar localization efficiency and study their impact on performance. First, we integrate a lightweight Doppler-based odometry method into a topometric localization pipeline and compare its performance against an iterative closest point (ICP)-based method. We highlight the trade-offs between these approaches: the Doppler estimator offers faster, lightweight updates, while ICP provides higher accuracy at the cost of increased computational load. Second, by controlling the frequency of localization updates and leveraging odometry estimates between them, we demonstrate that accurate localization can be maintained while optimizing for computational efficiency using either odometry method. Our experimental results show that localizing every 10 lidar frames strikes a favourable balance, achieving a localization accuracy below 0.05 meters in translation and below 0.1 degrees in orientation while reducing computational effort by over 30% in an ICP-based pipeline. We quantify the trade-off of accuracy to computational effort using over 100 kilometers of real-world driving data in different on-road environments.

Optimizing smart grid operations relies on critical decision-making informed by uncertainty quantification, making probabilistic forecasting a vital tool. Designing such forecasting models involves three key challenges: accurate and unbiased uncertainty quantification, workload reduction for data scientists during the design process, and limitation of the environmental impact of model training. In order to address these challenges, we introduce AutoPQ, a novel method designed to automate and optimize probabilistic forecasting for smart grid applications. AutoPQ enhances forecast uncertainty quantification by generating quantile forecasts from an existing point forecast by using a conditional Invertible Neural Network (cINN). AutoPQ also automates the selection of the underlying point forecasting method and the optimization of hyperparameters, ensuring that the best model and configuration is chosen for each application. For flexible adaptation to various performance needs and available computing power, AutoPQ comes with a default and an advanced configuration, making it suitable for a wide range of smart grid applications. Additionally, AutoPQ provides transparency regarding the electricity consumption required for performance improvements. We show that AutoPQ outperforms state-of-the-art probabilistic forecasting methods while effectively limiting computational effort and hence environmental impact. Additionally and in the context of sustainability, we quantify the electricity consumption required for performance improvements.