comparison density
CDfdr: A Comparison Density Approach to Local False Discovery Rate Estimation
Efron et al. (2001) proposed empirical Bayes formulation of the frequentist Benjamini and Hochbergs False Discovery Rate method (Benjamini and Hochberg,1995). This article attempts to unify the `two cultures' using concepts of comparison density and distribution function. We have also shown how almost all of the existing local fdr methods can be viewed as proposing various model specification for comparison density - unifies the vast literature of false discovery methods under one concept and notation.
Modeling, dependence, classification, united statistical science, many cultures
Parzen, Emanuel, Mukhopadhyay, Subhadeep
Breiman (2001) proposed to statisticians awareness of two cultures: 1. Parametric modeling culture, pioneered by R.A.Fisher and Jerzy Neyman; 2. Algorithmic predictive culture, pioneered by machine learning research. Parzen (2001), as a part of discussing Breiman (2001), proposed that researchers be aware of many cultures, including the focus of our research: 3. Nonparametric, quantile based, information theoretic modeling. We provide a unification of many statistical methods for traditional small data sets and emerging big data sets in terms of comparison density, copula density, measure of dependence, correlation, information, new measures (called LP score comoments) that apply to long tailed distributions with out finite second order moments. A very important goal is to unify methods for discrete and continuous random variables. Our research extends these methods to modern high dimensional data modeling.