Data-driven methods demonstrate considerable potential for accelerating the inherently expensive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers. Nevertheless, pure machine-learning surrogate models face challenges in ensuring physical consistency and scaling up to address real-world problems. This study presents a versatile and scalable hybrid methodology, combining CFD and machine learning, to accelerate long-term incompressible fluid flow simulations without compromising accuracy. A neural network was trained offline using simulated data of various two-dimensional transient buoyant plume flows. The objective was to leverage local features to predict the temporal changes in the pressure field in comparable scenarios. Due to cell-level predictions, the methodology was successfully applied to diverse geometries without additional training. Pressure estimates were employed as initial values to accelerate the pressure-velocity coupling procedure. The results demonstrated an average improvement of 94% in the initial guess for solving the Poisson equation. The first pressure corrector acceleration reached a mean factor of 3, depending on the iterative solver employed. Our work reveals that machine learning estimates at the cell level can enhance the efficiency of CFD iterative linear solvers while maintaining accuracy. Although the scalability of the methodology to more complex cases has yet to be demonstrated, this study underscores the prospective value of domain-specific hybrid solvers for CFD.

The high computational cost associated with solving for detailed chemistry poses a significant challenge for predictive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of turbulent reacting flows. These models often require solving a system of coupled stiff ordinary differential equations (ODEs). While deep learning techniques have been experimented with to develop faster surrogate models, they often fail to integrate reliably with CFD solvers. This instability arises because deep learning methods optimize for training error without ensuring compatibility with ODE solvers, leading to accumulation of errors over time. Recently, NeuralODE-based techniques have offered a promising solution by effectively modeling chemical kinetics. In this study, we extend the NeuralODE framework for stiff chemical kinetics by incorporating mass conservation constraints directly into the loss function during training. This ensures that the total mass and the elemental mass are conserved, a critical requirement for reliable downstream integration with CFD solvers. Proof-of-concept studies are performed with physics-constrained neuralODE (PC-NODE) approach for homogeneous autoignition of hydrogen-air mixture over a range of composition and thermodynamic conditions. Our results demonstrate that this enhancement not only improves the physical consistency with respect to mass conservation criteria but also ensures better robustness. Lastly, a posteriori studies are performed wherein the trained PC-NODE model is coupled with a 3D CFD solver for computing the chemical source terms. PC-NODE is shown to be more accurate relative to the purely data-driven neuralODE approach. Moreover, PC-NODE also exhibits robustness and generalizability to unseen initial conditions from within (interpolative capability) as well as outside (extrapolative capability) the training regime.

While a big wave of artificial intelligence (AI) has propagated to the field of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) acceleration studies, recent research has highlighted that the development of AI techniques that reconciles the following goals remains our primary task: (1) accurate prediction of unseen (future) time series in long-term CFD simulations (2) acceleration of simulations (3) an acceptable amount of training data and time (4) within a multiple PDEs condition. In this study, we propose a residual-based physics-informed transfer learning (RePIT) strategy to achieve these four objectives using ML-CFD hybrid computation. Our hypothesis is that long-term CFD simulation is feasible with the hybrid method where CFD and AI alternately calculate time series while monitoring the first principle's residuals. The feasibility of RePIT strategy was verified through a CFD case study on natural convection. In a single training approach, a residual scale change occurred around 100th timestep, resulting in predicted time series exhibiting non-physical patterns as well as a significant deviations from the ground truth. Conversely, RePIT strategy maintained the residuals within the defined range and demonstrated good accuracy throughout the entire simulation period. The maximum error from the ground truth was below 0.4 K for temperature and 0.024 m/s for x-axis velocity. Furthermore, the average time for 1 timestep by the ML-GPU and CFD-CPU calculations was 0.171 s and 0.015 s, respectively. Including the parameter-updating time, the simulation was accelerated by a factor of 1.9. In conclusion, our RePIT strategy is a promising technique to reduce the cost of CFD simulations in industry. However, more vigorous optimization and improvement studies are still necessary.

Imagine a world where machines can generate code to solve complex problems in the physical world around us. ChatGPT, a type of Natural Language Processor (NLP) which writes human-like responses from user input prompts can do just that. In this article, I am going to show you how. Right now, anyone can use the research release of ChatGPT -- you just need to head over to OpenAIs website and sign up for an account to try it. A lot is going on under the hood of ChatGPT and I am not going to attempt to explain it here (OpenAI gives a detailed overview of how the technology works on its website).

Though PINNs (physics-informed neural networks) are now deemed as a complement to traditional CFD (computational fluid dynamics) solvers rather than a replacement, their ability to solve the Navier-Stokes equations without given data is still of great interest. This report presents our not-so-successful experiments of solving the Navier-Stokes equations with PINN as a replacement for traditional solvers. We aim to, with our experiments, prepare readers for the challenges they may face if they are interested in data-free PINN. In this work, we used two standard flow problems: 2D Taylor-Green vortex at Re=100 and 2D cylinder flow at Re=200. The PINN method solved the 2D Taylor-Green vortex problem with acceptable results, and we used this flow as an accuracy and performance benchmark. About 32 hours of training were required for the PINN method's accuracy to match the accuracy of a 16x16 finite-difference simulation, which took less than 20 seconds. The 2D cylinder flow, on the other hand, did not produce a physical solution. The PINN method behaved like a steady-flow solver and did not capture the vortex shedding phenomenon. By sharing our experience, we would like to emphasize that the PINN method is still a work-in-progress, especially in terms of solving flow problems without any given data. More work is needed to make PINN feasible for real-world problems in such applications.

David Schmidt is protecting the environment, but not in the way he first intended. In engineering graduate school, his interest was nuclear fusion. A persuasive Ph.D. advisor guided him toward the physics of fuel injection, a process central to both inertial confinement fusion reactors and internal combustion engines, the advisor's other line of research. While electric cars may seem to be taking over, internal combustion engines (ICEs) will remain on the roads, seas, and tarmacs for decades to come. Schmidt's work makes them cleaner and more efficient.