This paper investigates the transformative potential of generative AI technologies, particularly large language models (LLMs), within the building industry. By leveraging these advanced AI tools, the study explores their application across key areas such as energy code compliance, building design optimization, and workforce training. The research highlights how LLMs can automate labor-intensive processes, significantly improving efficiency, accuracy, and safety in building practices. The paper also addresses the challenges associated with interpreting complex visual and textual data in architectural plans and regulatory codes, proposing innovative solutions to enhance AI-driven compliance checking and design processes. Additionally, the study considers the broader implications of AI integration, including the development of AI-powered tools for comprehensive code compliance across various regulatory domains and the potential for AI to revolutionize workforce training through realistic simulations. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the current capabilities of generative AI in the building industry while outlining future directions for research and development, aiming to pave the way for smarter, more sustainable, and responsive construction practices.

Data-driven models created by machine learning gain in importance in all fields of design and engineering. They have high potential to assist decision-makers in creating novel artefacts with better performance and sustainability. However, limited generalization and the black-box nature of these models lead to limited explainability and reusability. To overcome this situation, we propose a component-based approach to create partial component models by machine learning (ML). This component-based approach aligns deep learning with systems engineering (SE). For the domain of energy efficient building design, we first demonstrate better generalization of the component-based method by analyzing prediction accuracy outside the training data. We observe a much higher accuracy (R2 = 0.94) compared to conventional monolithic methods (R2 = 0.71). Second, we illustrate explainability by exemplary demonstrating how sensitivity information from SE and rules from low-depth decision trees serve engineering. Third, we evaluate explainability by qualitative and quantitative methods demonstrating the matching of preliminary knowledge and data-driven derived strategies and show correctness of activations at component interfaces compared to white-box simulation results (envelope components: R2 = 0.92..0.99; zones: R2 = 0.78..0.93). The key for component-based explainability is that activations at interfaces between the components are interpretable engineering quantities. The large range of possible configurations in composing components allows the examination of novel unseen design cases with understandable data-driven models. The matching of parameter ranges of components by similar probability distribution produces reusable, well-generalizing, and trustworthy models. The approach adapts the model structure to engineering methods of systems engineering and to domain knowledge.

Quality diversity algorithms can be used to efficiently create a diverse set of solutions to inform engineers' intuition. But quality diversity is not efficient in very expensive problems, needing 100.000s of evaluations. Even with the assistance of surrogate models, quality diversity needs 100s or even 1000s of evaluations, which can make it use infeasible. In this study we try to tackle this problem by using a pre-optimization strategy on a lower-dimensional optimization problem and then map the solutions to a higher-dimensional case. For a use case to design buildings that minimize wind nuisance, we show that we can predict flow features around 3D buildings from 2D flow features around building footprints. For a diverse set of building designs, by sampling the space of 2D footprints with a quality diversity algorithm, a predictive model can be trained that is more accurate than when trained on a set of footprints that were selected with a space-filling algorithm like the Sobol sequence. Simulating only 16 buildings in 3D, a set of 1024 building designs with low predicted wind nuisance is created. We show that we can produce better machine learning models by producing training data with quality diversity instead of using common sampling techniques. The method can bootstrap generative design in a computationally expensive 3D domain and allow engineers to sweep the design space, understanding wind nuisance in early design phases.

The demand for a huge amount of data for machine learning (ML) applications is currently a bottleneck in an empirically dominated field. We propose a method to combine prior knowledge with data-driven methods to significantly reduce their data dependency. In this study, component-based machine learning (CBML) as the knowledge-encoded data-driven method is examined in the context of energy-efficient building engineering. It encodes the abstraction of building structural knowledge as semantic information in the model organization. We design a case experiment to understand the efficacy of knowledge-encoded ML in sparse data input (1% - 0.0125% sampling rate). The result reveals its three advanced features compared with pure ML methods: 1. Significant improvement in the robustness of ML to extremely small-size and inconsistent datasets; 2. Efficient data utilization from different entities' record collections; 3. Characteristics of accepting incomplete data with high interpretability and reduced training time. All these features provide a promising path to alleviating the deployment bottleneck of data-intensive methods and contribute to efficient real-world data usage. Moreover, four necessary prerequisites are summarized in this study that ensures the target scenario benefits by combining prior knowledge and ML generalization.

Drones are already shaping the face of our cities – used for building planning, heritage, construction and safety enhancement. But, as studies by the UK's Department of Transport have found, swathes of the public have a limited understanding of how drones might be practically applied. It's crucial that the ways drones are affecting our future are understood by the majority of people. As experts in design futures and mobility, we hope this short overview of five ways drones will affect building design offers some knowledge of how things are likely to change. Infographic showcasing other ways drones will influence future building design.

As a society, living in a technological age, we have become incredibly used to rapid change. Sometimes it feelslike the one constant we can rely on is that everything will change. For millennia humankind lived in caves, scrawling drawings on the walls. The Stone Age was 2.5 million years long, then came the Bronze Age and, with it, urbanisation, which lasted 1,500 years. The first Industrial Revolution lasted just 80 years (1760 – 1840). Before we reached our current, digital age, the Wright Brothers perfected powered flight and just 66 years later, our species had escaped Earth's gravity, traversed the vacuum of space and landed on the moon.

Rapid advancements in digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) are driving significant change in the Nordic real estate sector and quickening the pace of transition to smart offices, factory buildings and high-street retail spaces. While existing and emerging technologies remain the primary catalyst for change, the real estate industry's transition is heavily motivated by a more robust focus on embracing energy-reduction technology to support the construction of next-generation smart buildings. The broader adoption of AI and digital technologies in smart building design is also influenced by the transformative nature of working practices across the Nordic countries that was triggered by the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. In Sweden, the mass return of employees to normal office functions during the first quarter of 2022 coincided with a national multi-sector debate on "workplace wellbeing" that looked at how AI and digital technologies, integrated into building design, could be used to deliver safer and superior environments for all employees. A link between the workplace environment and higher safety measures being demanded by trade unions at employers in Sweden features in a research-based report from real estate group Wihlborgs that was undertaken in partnership with NAVET Analytics and Quilt.AI.

Physical systems, such as electricity grids, are very complex and thereby difficult to model. Digital twins provide a solution. "Digital Twins are one of the top technological trends" Here will we discuss a literature review (2021) that was performed by researchers at Bosch Engineering. The review focused on how digital twin and "big data" technology can be applied to complex physical systems, such as energy grids. Without further ado, let's dive in.

When giant blobs began appearing on city skylines around the world in the late 1980s and 1990s, it marked not an alien invasion but the impact of computers on the practice of building design. Thanks to computer-aided design (CAD), architects were able to experiment with new organic forms, free from the restraints of slide rules and protractors. The result was famous curvy buildings such as Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao and Future Systems' Selfridges Department Store in Birmingham. Today, computers are poised to change buildings once again, this time with algorithms that can inform, refine and even create new designs. Even weirder shapes are just the start: algorithms can now work out the best ways to lay out rooms, construct the buildings and even change them over time to meet users' needs. In this way, algorithms are giving architects a whole new toolbox with which to realise and improve their ideas.

Saving energy is a major concern. Hence, it is fundamental to design and construct buildings that are energy-efficient. It is known that the early stage of architectural design has a significant impact on this matter. However, it is complex to create designs that are optimally energy efficient, and at the same time balance other essential criterias such as economics, space, and safety. One state-of-the art approach is to create parametric designs, and use a genetic algorithm to optimize across different objectives. We further improve this method, by aggregating the solutions of multiple agents. We evaluate diverse teams, composed by different agents; and uniform teams, composed by multiple copies of a single agent. We test our approach across three design cases of increasing complexity, and show that the diverse team provides a significantly larger percentage of optimal solutions than single agents.