The label ranking problem is a supervised learning scenario in which the learner predicts a total order of the class labels for a given input instance. Recently, research has increasingly focused on the partial label ranking problem, a generalization of the label ranking problem that allows ties in the predicted orders. So far, most existing learning approaches for the partial label ranking problem rely on approximation algorithms for rank aggregation in the final prediction step. This paper explores several alternative aggregation methods for this critical step, including scoring-based and probabilistic-based rank aggregation approaches. To enhance their suitability for the more general partial label ranking problem, the investigated methods are extended to increase the likelihood of producing ties. Experimental evaluations on standard benchmarks demonstrate that scoring-based variants consistently outperform the current state-of-the-art method in handling incomplete information. In contrast, probabilistic-based variants fail to achieve competitive performance.

In rank aggregation problems (RAP), the solution is usually a consensus ranking that generalizes a set of input orderings. There are different variants that differ not only in terms of the type of rankings that are used as input and output, but also in terms of the objective function employed to evaluate the quality of the desired output ranking. In contrast, in some machine learning tasks (e.g. subgroup discovery) or multimodal optimization tasks, attention is devoted to obtaining several models/results to account for the diversity in the input data or across the search landscape. Thus, in this paper we propose to provide, as the solution to an RAP, a set of rankings to better explain the preferences expressed in the input orderings. We exemplify our proposal through the Optimal Bucket Order Problem (OBOP), an RAP which consists in finding a single consensus ranking (with ties) that generalizes a set of input rankings codified as a precedence matrix. To address this, we introduce the Optimal Set of Bucket Orders Problem (OSBOP), a generalization of the OBOP that aims to produce not a single ranking as output but a set of consensus rankings. Experimental results are presented to illustrate this proposal, showing how, by providing a set of consensus rankings, the fitness of the solution significantly improves with respect to the one of the original OBOP, without losing comprehensibility.

As the issue of robustness in AI systems becomes vital, statistical learning techniques that are reliable even in presence of partly contaminated data have to be developed. Preference data, in the form of (complete) rankings in the simplest situations, are no exception and the demand for appropriate concepts and tools is all the more pressing given that technologies fed by or producing this type of data (e.g. search engines, recommending systems) are now massively deployed. However, the lack of vector space structure for the set of rankings (i.e. the symmetric group $\mathfrak{S}_n$) and the complex nature of statistics considered in ranking data analysis make the formulation of robustness objectives in this domain challenging. In this paper, we introduce notions of robustness, together with dedicated statistical methods, for Consensus Ranking the flagship problem in ranking data analysis, aiming at summarizing a probability distribution on $\mathfrak{S}_n$ by a median ranking. Precisely, we propose specific extensions of the popular concept of breakdown point, tailored to consensus ranking, and address the related computational issues. Beyond the theoretical contributions, the relevance of the approach proposed is supported by an experimental study.

Existing multi-label frameworks only exploit the information deduced from the bipartition of the labels into a positive and negative set. Therefore, they do not benefit from the ranking order between positive labels, which is the concept we introduce in this paper. We propose a novel multi-label ranking method: GaussianMLR, which aims to learn implicit class significance values that determine the positive label ranks instead of treating them as of equal importance, by following an approach that unifies ranking and classification tasks associated with multi-label ranking. Due to the scarcity of public datasets, we introduce eight synthetic datasets generated under varying importance factors to provide an enriched and controllable experimental environment for this study. On both real-world and synthetic datasets, we carry out extensive comparisons with relevant baselines and evaluate the performance on both of the two sub-tasks. We show that our method is able to accurately learn a representation of the incorporated positive rank order, which is not only consistent with the ground truth but also proportional to the underlying information. We strengthen our claims empirically by conducting comprehensive experimental studies.

Whereas most dimensionality reduction techniques (e.g. PCA, ICA, NMF) for multivariate data essentially rely on linear algebra to a certain extent, summarizing ranking data, viewed as realizations of a random permutation $\Sigma$ on a set of items indexed by $i\in \{1,\ldots,\; n\}$, is a great statistical challenge, due to the absence of vector space structure for the set of permutations $\mathfrak{S}_n$. It is the goal of this article to develop an original framework for possibly reducing the number of parameters required to describe the distribution of a statistical population composed of rankings/permutations, on the premise that the collection of items under study can be partitioned into subsets/buckets, such that, with high probability, items in a certain bucket are either all ranked higher or else all ranked lower than items in another bucket. In this context, $\Sigma$'s distribution can be hopefully represented in a sparse manner by a bucket distribution, i.e. a bucket ordering plus the ranking distributions within each bucket. More precisely, we introduce a dedicated distortion measure, based on a mass transportation metric, in order to quantify the accuracy of such representations. The performance of buckets minimizing an empirical version of the distortion is investigated through a rate bound analysis. Complexity penalization techniques are also considered to select the shape of a bucket order with minimum expected distortion. Beyond theoretical concepts and results, numerical experiments on real ranking data are displayed in order to provide empirical evidence of the relevance of the approach promoted.

We present a new Markov chain Monte Carlo method for estimating posterior probabilities of structural features in Bayesian networks. The method draws samples from the posterior distribution of partial orders on the nodes; for each sampled partial order, the conditional probabilities of interest are computed exactly. We give both analytical and empirical results that suggest the superiority of the new method compared to previous methods, which sample either directed acyclic graphs or linear orders on the nodes.