Bounded suboptimal search algorithms are usually faster than optimal ones, but they can still run out of memory on large problems. This paper makes three contributions. First, we show how solution length estimates, used by the current state-of-the-art linear-space bounded suboptimal search algorithm Iterative Deepening EES, can be used to improve unbounded-space suboptimal search. Second, we convert one of these improved algorithms into a linear-space variant called Iterative Deepening A* epsilon, resulting in a new state of the art in linear-space bounded suboptimal search. Third, we show how Recursive Best-First Search can be used to create additional linear-space variants that have more stable performance. Taken together, these results significantly expand our armamentarium of bounded suboptimal search algorithms.

Suboptimal search algorithms offer shorter solving times by sacrificing guaranteed solution optimality. While optimal searchalgorithms like A* and IDA* require admissible heuristics, suboptimalsearch algorithms need not constrain their guidance in this way. Previous work has explored using off-line training to transform admissible heuristics into more effective inadmissible ones. In this paper we demonstrate that this transformation can be performed on-line, during search. In addition to not requiring training instances and extensive pre-computation, an on-line approach allows the learned heuristic to be tailored to a specific problem instance. We evaluate our techniques in four different benchmark domains using both greedy best-first search and bounded suboptimal search. We find that heuristics learned on-line result in both faster search andbetter solutions while relying only on information readily available in any best-first search.

Anytime search is a pragmatic approach for trading solution cost and solving time. It can also be used for solving problems within a time bound. Three frameworks for constructing anytime algorithms from bounded suboptimal search have been proposed: continuing search, repairing search, and restarting search, but what combination of suboptimal search and anytime framework performs best? An extensive empirical evaluation results in several novel algorithms and reveals that the relative performance of frameworks is essentially fixed, with the repairing framework having the strongest overall performance. As part of our study, we present two enhancements to Anytime Window A* that allow it to solve a wider range of problems and hastens its convergance on optimal solutions.

Bounded suboptimal search algorithms attempt to find a solution quickly while guaranteeing that the cost does not exceed optimal by more than a desired factor. These algorithms generally use a single admissible heuristic both for guidance and guaranteeing solution quality. We present a new approach to bounded suboptimal search that separates these roles, consulting multiple sources of potentially inadmissible information to determine search order and using admissible information to guarantee quality. An empirical evaluation across six benchmark domains shows the new approach has better overall performance.