Goto

Collaborating Authors

 bias parameter






that not all comments are replied here and our replies have to be short due to space, but they'll be fully addressed in a

Neural Information Processing Systems

We appreciate the valuable comments, which urged us to embody explicit connections to practices of learning. We plead a reconsideration based on the improvement, as our contribution is truly innovative and nontrivial. Re: connection to learning, and when Cond.1&2 hold. Fig.1 shows large LR again produces stochasticity as our paper studies. Cond.1&2 use auxiliary random variables to define the needed f Re: weaken isotropic noise assumption?


Modeling Saliency Dataset Bias

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Recent advances in image-based saliency prediction are approaching gold standard performance levels on existing benchmarks. Despite this success, we show that predicting fixations across multiple saliency datasets remains challenging due to dataset bias. W e find a significant performance drop (around 40%) when models trained on one dataset are applied to another . Surprisingly, increasing dataset diversity does not resolve this inter-dataset gap, with close to 60% attributed to dataset-specific biases. T o address this remaining generalization gap, we propose a novel architecture extending a mostly dataset-agnostic encoder-decoder structure with fewer than 20 dataset-specific parameters that govern interpretable mechanisms such as multi-scale structure, center bias, and fixation spread. Adapting only these parameters to new data accounts for more than 75% of the generalization gap, with a large fraction of the improvement achieved with as few as 50 samples. Our model sets a new state-of-the-art on all three datasets of the MIT/Tuebingen Saliency Benchmark (MIT300, CAT2000, and COCO-Freeview), even when purely generalizing from unrelated datasets, but with a substantial boost when adapting to the respective training datasets. The model also provides valuable insights into spatial saliency properties, revealing complex multi-scale effects that combine both absolute and relative sizes.


Multi-Resolution Cascades for Multiclass Object Detection

Neural Information Processing Systems

An algorithm for learning fast multiclass object detection cascades is introduced. It produces multi-resolution (MRes) cascades, whose early stages are binary target vs. non-target detectors that eliminate false positives, late stages multiclass classifiers that finely discriminate target classes, and middle stages have intermediate numbers of classes, determined in a data-driven manner. This MRes structure is achieved with a new structurally biased boosting algorithm (SBBoost). SBBost extends previous multiclass boosting approaches, whose boosting mechanisms are shown to implement two complementary data-driven biases: 1) the standard bias towards examples difficult to classify, and 2) a bias towards difficult classes. It is shown that structural biases can be implemented by generalizing this class-based bias, so as to encourage the desired MRes structure.