Mutual Information (MI) is a fundamental measure of statistical dependence widely used in representation learning. While direct optimization of MI via its definition as a Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) is often intractable, many recent methods have instead maximized alternative dependence measures, most notably, the JensenShannon divergence (JSD) between joint and product of marginal distributions via discriminative losses. However, the connection between these surrogate objectives and MI remains poorly understood.

The literature largely focuses on lossy compression of model updates in deterministic FL. In contrast, stochastic (Bayesian) FL considers distributions over parameters, enabling uncertainty quantification, better generalization, and, crucially, inherent communication-regularized training through a mirror-descent structure. In this paper, we consider both uplink and downlink communication in stochastic FL, and propose a communication framework based on remote source generation. Employing Minimal Random Coding (MRC) for remote generation, we allow the server and the clients to sample from local and global posteriors (sources), respectively, rather than transmitting locally sampled updates. The framework encompasses communication-regularized local optimization and principled compression of model updates, leveraging gradually updated prior distributions as side information. Through extensive simulations, we show that our method achieves 5 32 reduction in total communication cost while preserving accuracy. We further analyze the communication cost, refining existing MRC bounds and enabling precise quantification of uplink and downlink trade-offs. We also extend our method to conventional FL via stochastic quantization and prove a contraction property for the biased MRC compressor to facilitate convergence analysis.

Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) are a fundamental tool for concept-based explainability in deep learning, yet their practical utility is limited by statistical instability. We analyze the stochastic nature of CAVs and the Testing with CAVs (TCAV) method, deriving the distributions of major CAV classes including PatternCAV, FastCAV, and ridge regression-based CAVs. We then identify a fundamental flaw in the standard TCAV score: its reliance on a discontinuous indicator function induces non-decaying variance in critical regimes. To address this, we introduce $α$-TCAV, a generalized framework that replaces the indicator with a parameterized smooth function, yielding a unified probabilistic formulation that subsumes both TCAV and Multi-TCAV. We characterize the induced distributions of sensitivity scores and different TCAV variants, showing that established state-of-the-art choices lack theoretical justification. We provide principled guidance on tuning the parameter in $α$-TCAV -- either to imitate Multi-TCAV at substantially lower computational cost, or to obtain a calibrated Bayes-optimal probabilistic measure of a concept's influence. Finally, our analysis yields practical recommendations that challenge established routines: most notably, allocating the full sampling budget to a single CAV rather than splitting it across several.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Well-calibrated uncertainty is crucial for many tasks in deep learning.

Boltzmann machines (BMs) are appealing candidates for powerful priors in varia-tional autoencoders (V AEs), as they are capable of capturing nontrivial and multi-modal distributions over discrete variables.