Levin et al. (2019) show experimentally that the interpretations of novel English noun compounds (e.g., stew skillet), while not fully compositional, are highly predictable based on whether the modifier and head refer to artifacts or natural kinds. Is the large language model GPT-3 governed by the same interpretive principles? To address this question, we first compare Levin et al.'s experimental data with GPT-3 generations, finding a high degree of similarity. However, this evidence is consistent with GPT3 reasoning only about specific lexical items rather than the more abstract conceptual categories of Levin et al.'s theory. To probe more deeply, we construct prompts that require the relevant kind of conceptual reasoning. Here, we fail to find convincing evidence that GPT-3 is reasoning about more than just individual lexical items. These results highlight the importance of controlling for low-level distributional regularities when assessing whether a large language model latently encodes a deeper theory.

We first analyze the consumer view to determine the momentum and awareness amongst people in social media. These days consumers look for everything on the internet and this data trail is a great source of insights. We analyze the chatter on social media, analyze search trends of the consumers & find specific pattern of internet lookups. This analysis serves as a lead indicator for the topic to understand the conversations and feedback better. We analyze 5 years of search data from 2017-08-06 to 2022-07-31.

Distributional semantic models represent the meaning of words as vectors. We introduce a selection method to learn a vector space that each of its dimensions is a natural word. The selection method starts from the most frequent words and selects a subset, which has the best performance. The method produces a vector space that each of its dimensions is a word. This is the main advantage of the method compared to fusion methods such as NMF, and neural embedding models. We apply the method to the ukWaC corpus and train a vector space of N=1500 basis words. We report tests results on word similarity tasks for MEN, RG-65, SimLex-999, and WordSim353 gold datasets. Also, results show that reducing the number of basis vectors from 5000 to 1500 reduces accuracy by about 1.5-2%. So, we achieve good interpretability without a large penalty. Interpretability evaluation results indicate that the word vectors obtained by the proposed method using N=1500 are more interpretable than word embedding models, and the baseline method. We report the top 15 words of 1500 selected basis words in this paper.