Hallucinations present a significant challenge in the development and evaluation of large language models (LLMs), directly affecting their reliability and accuracy. While notable advancements have been made in research on textual and visual hallucinations, there is still a lack of a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating auditory hallucinations in large audio language models (LALMs). To fill this gap, we introduce AHa-Bench, a systematic and comprehensive benchmark for audio hallucinations. Audio data, in particular, uniquely combines the multi-attribute complexity of visual data with the semantic richness of textual data, leading to auditory hallucinations that share characteristics with both visual and textual hallucinations. Based on the source of these hallucinations, AHa-Bench categorizes them into semantic hallucinations, acoustic hallucinations, and semantic-acoustic confusion hallucinations. In addition, we systematically evaluate seven opensource local perception language models (LALMs), demonstrating the challenges these models face in audio understanding, especially when it comes to jointly understanding semantic and acoustic information. Through the development of a comprehensive evaluation framework, AHa-Bench aims to enhance robustness of LALMs, fostering more reliable and nuanced audio understanding in LALMs.

Large audio-video language models can generate descriptions for both video and audio. However, they sometimes ignore audio content, producing audio descriptions solely reliant on visual information. This paper refers to this as audio hallucinations and analyzes them in large audio-video language models. We gather 1,000 sentences by inquiring about audio information and annotate them whether they contain hallucinations. If a sentence is hallucinated, we also categorize the type of hallucination. The results reveal that 332 sentences are hallucinated with distinct trends observed in nouns and verbs for each hallucination type. Based on this, we tackle a task of audio hallucination classification using pre-trained audio-text models in the zero-shot and fine-tuning settings. Our experimental results reveal that the zero-shot models achieve higher performance (52.2% in F1) than the random (40.3%) and the fine-tuning models achieve 87.9%, outperforming the zero-shot models.