We analyze two widely used local attribution methods, Local Shapley Values and LIME, which aim to quantify the contribution of a feature value $x_i$ to a specific prediction $f(x_1, \dots, x_p)$. Despite their widespread use, we identify fundamental limitations in their ability to reliably detect locally important features, even under ideal conditions with exact computations and independent features. We argue that a sound local attribution method should not assign importance to features that neither influence the model output (e.g., features with zero coefficients in a linear model) nor exhibit statistical dependence with functionality-relevant features. We demonstrate that both Local SV and LIME violate this fundamental principle. To address this, we propose R-LOCO (Regional Leave Out COvariates), which bridges the gap between local and global explanations and provides more accurate attributions. R-LOCO segments the input space into regions with similar feature importance characteristics. It then applies global attribution methods within these regions, deriving an instance's feature contributions from its regional membership. This approach delivers more faithful local attributions while avoiding local explanation instability and preserving instance-specific detail often lost in global methods.

Data attribution methods aim to quantify the influence of individual training samples on the prediction of artificial intelligence (AI) models.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities, demys-tifying their internal mechanisms becomes increasingly vital.

Attribution maps are one of the most established tools to explain the functioning of computer vision models. They assign importance scores to input features, indicating how relevant each feature is for the prediction of a deep neural network.

In our case, it boils down to: ' The smoothing effect induced by the average helps to reduce the visual noise, and hence improves the explanations. For the experiment, m and are the same as SmoothGrad. We start by deriving the closed form of Saliency (SA) and naturally Gradient-Input (GI): ' The case of V arGrad is specific, as the gradient of a linear system being constant, its variance is null. W We recall that for Gradient Input, Integrated Gradients, Occlusion, ' It was quickly realized that they unified properties of various domains such as graph theory, linear algebra or geometry. Later, in the '60s, a connection was made At each step, the insertion metric selects the concepts of maximum score given a cardinality constraint.

In recent years, concept-based approaches have emerged as some of the most promising explainability methods to help us interpret the decisions of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs).

Explainable AI (XAI) is a rapidly growing domain with a myriad of proposed methods as well as metrics aiming to evaluate their efficacy.

To this end, two broad strategies have been outlined in prior literature to explain models.