LLMs have become the mainstream approaches to code generation. Existing LLMs mainly employ autoregressive generation, i.e. generating code token-by-token from left to right. However, the underlying autoregressive generation has two limitations in code generation. First, autoregressive LLMs only generate a token at each step, showing low efficiency in practice. Second, programming is a non-sequential process involving back-and-forth editing, while autoregressive LLMs only employ the left-to-right generation order. These two intrinsic limitations hinder the further development of LLMs in code generation. Recently, diffusion LLMs have emerged as a promising alternative. Diffusion LLMs address the above limitations with two advances, including multi-token prediction (i.e. generating multiple tokens at each step) and flexible generation order (i.e. flexibly determining which positions to generate tokens). However, there is no systematic study exploring diffusion LLMs in code generation. To bridge the knowledge gap, we present the first empirical study of diffusion LLMs for code generation. Our study involves 9 representative diffusion LLMs and conduct experiments on 4 widely used benchmarks. Based on the results, we summarize the following findings. (1) Existing diffusion LLMs are competitive with autoregressive LLMs with similar sizes. (2) Diffusion LLMs have a stronger length extrapolation ability than autoregressive LLMs and perform better in long code understanding. (3) We explore factors impacting the effectiveness and efficiency of diffusion LLMs, and provide practical guidance. (4) We discuss several promising further directions to improve diffusion LLMs on code generation. We open-source all source code, data, and results to facilitate the following research. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/zhangyitonggg/dllm4code.

Parallelizing sequentially written programs is a challenging task. Even experienced developers need to spend considerable time finding parallelism opportunities and then actually writing parallel versions of sequentially written programs. To address this issue, we present AUTOPARLLM, a framework for automatically discovering parallelism and generating the parallel version of the sequentially written program. Our framework consists of two major components: i) a heterogeneous Graph Neural Network (GNN) based parallelism discovery and parallel pattern detection module, and ii) an LLM-based code generator to generate the parallel counterpart of the sequential programs. We use the GNN to learn the flow-aware characteristics of the programs to identify parallel regions in sequential programs and then construct an enhanced prompt using the GNN's results for the LLM-based generator to finally produce the parallel counterparts of the sequential programs. We evaluate AUTOPARLLM on 11 applications of 2 well-known benchmark suites: NAS Parallel Benchmark and Rodinia Benchmark. Our results show that AUTOPARLLM is indeed effective in improving the state-of-the-art LLM-based models for the task of parallel code generation in terms of multiple code generation metrics. AUTOPARLLM also improves the average runtime of the parallel code generated by the state-of-the-art LLMs by as high as 3.4% and 2.9% for the NAS Parallel Benchmark and Rodinia Benchmark respectively. Additionally, to overcome the issue that well-known metrics for translation evaluation have not been optimized to evaluate the quality of the generated parallel code, we propose OMPScore for evaluating the quality of the generated code. We show that OMPScore exhibits a better correlation with human judgment than existing metrics, measured by up to 75% improvement of Spearman correlation.