Many AI systems, such as robots, must plan under time constraints. The most popular search approach applied in robotics so far is anytime search, in which the algorithm quickly finds a suboptimal plan, and then continues to find better and better plans as time passes, until eventually converging on an optimal plan. However, the time until the first plan is returned is not controllable, so such methods inherently involve idling the system's operation before real' execution can begin. Real-time search methods provide hard real-time bounds on action selection time, yet to our knowledge, they have not yet been demonstrated for robotic systems. In this work, we compare anytime and real-time heuristic search methods in their ability to allow agents to achieve goals quickly.Our results suggest that real-time search is more broadly applicable and often achieves goals faster than anytime search, while anytime search finds shorter plans and does not suffer from dead-ends.

Depth-First Branch and Bound (DFBnB) is an anytime algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper we present a weighted version of DFBnB, wDFBnB, which incorporates standard techniques for using weights in heuristic search and offers suboptimality guarantees. Our main contribution drawn from a preliminary evaluation is the observation that wDFBnB, used along with automated or hand-crafted weight schedules, can significantly outperform DFBnB both in terms of anytime behavior and convergence to the optimal. We think this small study calls for more research on the design of automated weight schedules that could provide superior anytime performance across a wider range of domains.

Heuristic search is a central component of many important applications in AI including automated planning.  While we can find  optimal solutions to heuristic search problems, doing so may take hours or days. For practical applications, this is unacceptably slow, and we must rely on algorithms which find solutions of high, but not optimal, quality or ones which bound the time used directly. In my dissertation, I present and analyze algorithms for the following settings: quality bounded heuristic search and time  bounded heuristic search. The central theme of my doctoral work will be that taking advantage of additional information can improve the performance of heuristic search algorithms.

Anytime search is a pragmatic approach for trading solution cost and solving time. It can also be used for solving problems within a time bound. Three frameworks for constructing anytime algorithms from bounded suboptimal search have been proposed: continuing search, repairing search, and restarting search, but what combination of suboptimal search and anytime framework performs best? An extensive empirical evaluation results in several novel algorithms and reveals that the relative performance of frameworks is essentially fixed, with the repairing framework having the strongest overall performance. As part of our study, we present two enhancements to Anytime Window A* that allow it to solve a wider range of problems and hastens its convergance on optimal solutions.

A* is the optimal algorithm for finding optimal solutions to heuristic search problems. Given the same amount of information, no search can expand fewer nodes. Many applications of heuristic search only require that we find solutions of reasonable quality or in a reasonable amount of time, where reasonable is defined by the needs of a user. My doctoral work will address these problems by developing new bounded suboptimal algorithms which perform better than the previous approaches. I will show that anytime searches can incorporate these new algorithms to improve their own performance. I will demonstrate that anytime search is not the correct approach when a deadline is known at the beginning of the search, and introduce deadline-aware search algorithms that address this setting directly.