Artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in recent years, and it has even started to create its own art. This has sparked a debate about the validity of AI-created art and whether it can be considered on the same level as human-created art. In this article, we will explore why AI-created art is just as valid as human-created art, and why artists need to stop clinging to the past and embrace the future. One argument in favor of AI-created art is that it is a reflection of the world we live in. In today's digital age, AI is an integral part of our lives, and it is only natural that it should also be a part of the art we create. By using AI to create art, we are able to capture and reflect the world in a way that is unique and innovative.

Rather, it's because people value their scarcity, prospect their future price, appreciate their proof-of-concept of a new artform, or love the artist who created them. However, a new trend in the art world, AI-generated art, may soon disrupt the multibillion-dollar NFT space. First, let's look at how collections of NFTs are created today. In most high-profile NFT projects, artists design multiple classes of varying attributes such as hair color, background color, or skin tone. Then, artists will mix and match these attributes to create a collection of "unique" NFTs, where no two NFTs look the same.

Art is a universal human behavior. Humans are an artistic species. Today, AI Art is a great medium to tell stories and spread messages that are much-needed for the culture we live in today. Humans have the urge to communicate, express themselves and share their experiences. Machines are not limited by those urges.